See, I just don't see the point. Having her explicitly fantasize sex with him renders it moot.
If she's explicitly fantasizing sex despite the AR, what's the substantial dif?
Yeah I really had no idea what to make of that. "Studly"? WTF? How he got from "Love him when you say you love him", from this:
To "studly"? The disconnect here is enormous. I'm definitely with Barb re: shit or get off the pot but it's exactly as you say, he never will. As long as anyone keeps reading and hoping that it (whatever "it" you prefer) will happen, as long as anyone says "I trust Joss", then he has every incentive to keep stringing readers along. And so every character is regressed and kept in stasis. And it's a particularly disappointing contrast to the series; one of the best things about it was, unlike almost every other US nighttime tv drama series I've watched, characters changed over time.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2013-07-25 04:49 pm (UTC)If she's explicitly fantasizing sex despite the AR, what's the substantial dif?
Yeah I really had no idea what to make of that. "Studly"? WTF? How he got from "Love him when you say you love him", from this:
To "studly"? The disconnect here is enormous. I'm definitely with Barb re: shit or get off the pot but it's exactly as you say, he never will. As long as anyone keeps reading and hoping that it (whatever "it" you prefer) will happen, as long as anyone says "I trust Joss", then he has every incentive to keep stringing readers along. And so every character is regressed and kept in stasis. And it's a particularly disappointing contrast to the series; one of the best things about it was, unlike almost every other US nighttime tv drama series I've watched, characters changed over time.