Meme

Heh. Not really, but okay. I mean, I write vampire fanfic so I can't quibble TOO much.


GOTHICS! - Deep, dark, mysterious and melodramatic.
You are drawn to write tales of the shadows and
what might lurk there. Could it be Love? Or
Madness? Anne Rice and Brahm Stoker are your
guides.


What Kind of Novel Should I Write?
brought to you by Quizilla

Meme

Heh. Not really, but okay. I mean, I write vampire fanfic so I can't quibble TOO much.


GOTHICS! - Deep, dark, mysterious and melodramatic.
You are drawn to write tales of the shadows and
what might lurk there. Could it be Love? Or
Madness? Anne Rice and Brahm Stoker are your
guides.


What Kind of Novel Should I Write?
brought to you by Quizilla

Meme

Heh. Not really, but okay. I mean, I write vampire fanfic so I can't quibble TOO much.


GOTHICS! - Deep, dark, mysterious and melodramatic.
You are drawn to write tales of the shadows and
what might lurk there. Could it be Love? Or
Madness? Anne Rice and Brahm Stoker are your
guides.


What Kind of Novel Should I Write?
brought to you by Quizilla

Pratchett Unhappy with Rowling

You know, while I'm sure that it's partly founded in envy, I can understand some of Pratchett's pissiness at Rowling making comments such as:

Pratchett Speaks about Rowling

In a recent interview with Time magazine, Rowling said she was "not a huge fan of fantasy" and was trying to "subvert" the genre.

The magazine also said Rowling reinvented fantasy fiction, which was previously stuck in "an idealised, romanticised, pseudofeudal world, where knights and ladies morris-dance to Greensleeves".

Wha-huh? It's not like she INVENTED wizards in the present or fantasy in the present. I read "Wizard of Seattle" years before Harry Potter. And I know that there are tons of other books that tread those grounds. I suppose Rowling is right, she really isn't a fan of the genre.

Pratchett Unhappy with Rowling

You know, while I'm sure that it's partly founded in envy, I can understand some of Pratchett's pissiness at Rowling making comments such as:

Pratchett Speaks about Rowling

In a recent interview with Time magazine, Rowling said she was "not a huge fan of fantasy" and was trying to "subvert" the genre.

The magazine also said Rowling reinvented fantasy fiction, which was previously stuck in "an idealised, romanticised, pseudofeudal world, where knights and ladies morris-dance to Greensleeves".

Wha-huh? It's not like she INVENTED wizards in the present or fantasy in the present. I read "Wizard of Seattle" years before Harry Potter. And I know that there are tons of other books that tread those grounds. I suppose Rowling is right, she really isn't a fan of the genre.

Pratchett Unhappy with Rowling

You know, while I'm sure that it's partly founded in envy, I can understand some of Pratchett's pissiness at Rowling making comments such as:

Pratchett Speaks about Rowling

In a recent interview with Time magazine, Rowling said she was "not a huge fan of fantasy" and was trying to "subvert" the genre.

The magazine also said Rowling reinvented fantasy fiction, which was previously stuck in "an idealised, romanticised, pseudofeudal world, where knights and ladies morris-dance to Greensleeves".

Wha-huh? It's not like she INVENTED wizards in the present or fantasy in the present. I read "Wizard of Seattle" years before Harry Potter. And I know that there are tons of other books that tread those grounds. I suppose Rowling is right, she really isn't a fan of the genre.