shipperx: (smug spok)

This dude's history rant probably amused me more than it should've, but I lol'd:  ExpandRead more... )
*snicker*
shipperx: (beautiful disaster)

From Discovery News

Arrotino detail

A sandstone sculpture of a kneeling man sharpening a knife could be a long forgotten work by Michelangelo, according to an Italian scholar who has rediscovered the statue in a private collection.

Measuring 111 centimeters (3.65 feet), the statue is now on display for the first time after more than 120 years at the exhibition, “And There Was Light. The Masters of the Renaissance,” in Göteborg, Sweden.

The powerful sculpture is a copy of a marble statue known as the “Arrotino” (the Blade-Sharpener) on display at the Uffizi gallery in Florence.

Representing the Scythian slave who served Apollo and flayed the satyr Marsyas, the Uffizi sculpture is itself a Roman copy from a lost Hellenistic original.

“The sandstone Arrotino lacks of the nose and two left fingers. At a first look, this made me suspicious: Nose-missing statues are often forgeries. This was a known expedient to give a statue an antique look,” Flavia Zisa, archaeologist at the Kore University of Enna, Sicily, told Discovery News.

Believed to be an original Greek sculpture, the Uffizi Arrotino became the subject of innumerable faithful copies, especially in the 17th century.

Upon further investigation, "it became clear that the sandstone Arrotino, was not a copy at all. Many features make this a unique sculpture,” Zisa said.

Following extensive archival research, Zisa found the first reference to the sandstone statue in a 1751 book on Pisa’s monuments.

In his description of the Palazzo Lanfranchi, author Pandolfo Titi wrote that when the building was under construction, Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475 - 1564) “was working there at that beautiful statue of the Arrotino, which he copied from the ancient Greek one in the Tribuna of the Galleria dei Medici.”

“I would be inclined to say that this statue crafted by Michelangelo’s chisel, while made of Gonfolina sandstone, better brings out the softness of the flesh. ... And next to it is displayed a beautiful Harpy for a fountain, a figure astride a frog,” Titi wrote.

According to Alessandro Vezzosi, director of the Museo Ideale Leonardo Da Vinci and artistic director of the Swedish exhibition, there is no doubt that the sandstone Arrotino is the statue Titi saw in Pisa.

“Titi’s descriptions appear correct, especially when he refers to the grey Gonfolina sandstone. The great stone blocks, which are even mentioned by Leonardo Da Vinci in the Codex Leicester, are found on a stretch of the Arno not far from Florence near the village of Carmignano, and were used since medieval times,” Vezzosi told Discovery News.

Completed 15 years after Michelangelo’s death, the Palazzo Lanfranchi was sold by its owners -- without the two sculptures -- in 1827.

“The fact that the Lanfranchis decided to the keep the two statues when selling their entire property gives an idea of how valued the sculptures might have been considered," Zisa said.

On display in Florence’s Bargello museum until 1888, the sculptures were then moved to the Capannoli Villa near Pisa, and ultimately ended up on the antiquarian market. They currently belong to two separate owners.

While the Harpy was attributed to the Mannerist sculptor Tribolo (around 1500 - 1550) and displayed at a few exhibitions, the Lanfranchi Arrotino fell into oblivion.

According to Zisa, the sculpture shows great attention to anatomical features, while the touching surfaces adhere as if permeating one another.  “Moreover, the cloak wrapped around the right side of the figure may be a correction of the unnatural hanging of the cloth in the original sculpture. It is covered with dense, parallel stripes -- a decorative pattern that can be also found in the cloak of the Lorenzo de’ Medici statue by Michelangelo in the Medici Chapels in Florence,” Zisa said.

It is known that Michelangelo may have copied classical statues. According to the artist and art historian Giorgio Vasari (1511 - 1574), the master carved a marble cupid, buried it for a time to make it seem older than it was, and sold it as an ancient sculpture to a dealer.

“The relationship between Michelangelo and the classical statuary is very interesting. Further studies are required on the Lanfranchi Arrotino. It certainly deserves to be reevaluated,” Vezzosi said.



shipperx: (beautiful disaster)

From Discovery News

Arrotino detail

A sandstone sculpture of a kneeling man sharpening a knife could be a long forgotten work by Michelangelo, according to an Italian scholar who has rediscovered the statue in a private collection.

Measuring 111 centimeters (3.65 feet), the statue is now on display for the first time after more than 120 years at the exhibition, “And There Was Light. The Masters of the Renaissance,” in Göteborg, Sweden.

The powerful sculpture is a copy of a marble statue known as the “Arrotino” (the Blade-Sharpener) on display at the Uffizi gallery in Florence.

Representing the Scythian slave who served Apollo and flayed the satyr Marsyas, the Uffizi sculpture is itself a Roman copy from a lost Hellenistic original.

“The sandstone Arrotino lacks of the nose and two left fingers. At a first look, this made me suspicious: Nose-missing statues are often forgeries. This was a known expedient to give a statue an antique look,” Flavia Zisa, archaeologist at the Kore University of Enna, Sicily, told Discovery News.

Believed to be an original Greek sculpture, the Uffizi Arrotino became the subject of innumerable faithful copies, especially in the 17th century.

Upon further investigation, "it became clear that the sandstone Arrotino, was not a copy at all. Many features make this a unique sculpture,” Zisa said.

Following extensive archival research, Zisa found the first reference to the sandstone statue in a 1751 book on Pisa’s monuments.

In his description of the Palazzo Lanfranchi, author Pandolfo Titi wrote that when the building was under construction, Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475 - 1564) “was working there at that beautiful statue of the Arrotino, which he copied from the ancient Greek one in the Tribuna of the Galleria dei Medici.”

“I would be inclined to say that this statue crafted by Michelangelo’s chisel, while made of Gonfolina sandstone, better brings out the softness of the flesh. ... And next to it is displayed a beautiful Harpy for a fountain, a figure astride a frog,” Titi wrote.

According to Alessandro Vezzosi, director of the Museo Ideale Leonardo Da Vinci and artistic director of the Swedish exhibition, there is no doubt that the sandstone Arrotino is the statue Titi saw in Pisa.

“Titi’s descriptions appear correct, especially when he refers to the grey Gonfolina sandstone. The great stone blocks, which are even mentioned by Leonardo Da Vinci in the Codex Leicester, are found on a stretch of the Arno not far from Florence near the village of Carmignano, and were used since medieval times,” Vezzosi told Discovery News.

Completed 15 years after Michelangelo’s death, the Palazzo Lanfranchi was sold by its owners -- without the two sculptures -- in 1827.

“The fact that the Lanfranchis decided to the keep the two statues when selling their entire property gives an idea of how valued the sculptures might have been considered," Zisa said.

On display in Florence’s Bargello museum until 1888, the sculptures were then moved to the Capannoli Villa near Pisa, and ultimately ended up on the antiquarian market. They currently belong to two separate owners.

While the Harpy was attributed to the Mannerist sculptor Tribolo (around 1500 - 1550) and displayed at a few exhibitions, the Lanfranchi Arrotino fell into oblivion.

According to Zisa, the sculpture shows great attention to anatomical features, while the touching surfaces adhere as if permeating one another.  “Moreover, the cloak wrapped around the right side of the figure may be a correction of the unnatural hanging of the cloth in the original sculpture. It is covered with dense, parallel stripes -- a decorative pattern that can be also found in the cloak of the Lorenzo de’ Medici statue by Michelangelo in the Medici Chapels in Florence,” Zisa said.

It is known that Michelangelo may have copied classical statues. According to the artist and art historian Giorgio Vasari (1511 - 1574), the master carved a marble cupid, buried it for a time to make it seem older than it was, and sold it as an ancient sculpture to a dealer.

“The relationship between Michelangelo and the classical statuary is very interesting. Further studies are required on the Lanfranchi Arrotino. It certainly deserves to be reevaluated,” Vezzosi said.



shipperx: (beautiful disaster)

From Discovery News

Arrotino detail

A sandstone sculpture of a kneeling man sharpening a knife could be a long forgotten work by Michelangelo, according to an Italian scholar who has rediscovered the statue in a private collection.

Measuring 111 centimeters (3.65 feet), the statue is now on display for the first time after more than 120 years at the exhibition, “And There Was Light. The Masters of the Renaissance,” in Göteborg, Sweden.

The powerful sculpture is a copy of a marble statue known as the “Arrotino” (the Blade-Sharpener) on display at the Uffizi gallery in Florence.

Representing the Scythian slave who served Apollo and flayed the satyr Marsyas, the Uffizi sculpture is itself a Roman copy from a lost Hellenistic original.

“The sandstone Arrotino lacks of the nose and two left fingers. At a first look, this made me suspicious: Nose-missing statues are often forgeries. This was a known expedient to give a statue an antique look,” Flavia Zisa, archaeologist at the Kore University of Enna, Sicily, told Discovery News.

Believed to be an original Greek sculpture, the Uffizi Arrotino became the subject of innumerable faithful copies, especially in the 17th century.

Upon further investigation, "it became clear that the sandstone Arrotino, was not a copy at all. Many features make this a unique sculpture,” Zisa said.

Following extensive archival research, Zisa found the first reference to the sandstone statue in a 1751 book on Pisa’s monuments.

In his description of the Palazzo Lanfranchi, author Pandolfo Titi wrote that when the building was under construction, Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475 - 1564) “was working there at that beautiful statue of the Arrotino, which he copied from the ancient Greek one in the Tribuna of the Galleria dei Medici.”

“I would be inclined to say that this statue crafted by Michelangelo’s chisel, while made of Gonfolina sandstone, better brings out the softness of the flesh. ... And next to it is displayed a beautiful Harpy for a fountain, a figure astride a frog,” Titi wrote.

According to Alessandro Vezzosi, director of the Museo Ideale Leonardo Da Vinci and artistic director of the Swedish exhibition, there is no doubt that the sandstone Arrotino is the statue Titi saw in Pisa.

“Titi’s descriptions appear correct, especially when he refers to the grey Gonfolina sandstone. The great stone blocks, which are even mentioned by Leonardo Da Vinci in the Codex Leicester, are found on a stretch of the Arno not far from Florence near the village of Carmignano, and were used since medieval times,” Vezzosi told Discovery News.

Completed 15 years after Michelangelo’s death, the Palazzo Lanfranchi was sold by its owners -- without the two sculptures -- in 1827.

“The fact that the Lanfranchis decided to the keep the two statues when selling their entire property gives an idea of how valued the sculptures might have been considered," Zisa said.

On display in Florence’s Bargello museum until 1888, the sculptures were then moved to the Capannoli Villa near Pisa, and ultimately ended up on the antiquarian market. They currently belong to two separate owners.

While the Harpy was attributed to the Mannerist sculptor Tribolo (around 1500 - 1550) and displayed at a few exhibitions, the Lanfranchi Arrotino fell into oblivion.

According to Zisa, the sculpture shows great attention to anatomical features, while the touching surfaces adhere as if permeating one another.  “Moreover, the cloak wrapped around the right side of the figure may be a correction of the unnatural hanging of the cloth in the original sculpture. It is covered with dense, parallel stripes -- a decorative pattern that can be also found in the cloak of the Lorenzo de’ Medici statue by Michelangelo in the Medici Chapels in Florence,” Zisa said.

It is known that Michelangelo may have copied classical statues. According to the artist and art historian Giorgio Vasari (1511 - 1574), the master carved a marble cupid, buried it for a time to make it seem older than it was, and sold it as an ancient sculpture to a dealer.

“The relationship between Michelangelo and the classical statuary is very interesting. Further studies are required on the Lanfranchi Arrotino. It certainly deserves to be reevaluated,” Vezzosi said.



shipperx: (Default)

Confederate History Month?  Seriously?  I'm not sure that everyone has heard about this epic fail, but in this age when the asshole governor of Texas talks about secession, the governor of Virginia has declared this April to be 'Confederate History Month'... while...er... 'whitewashing' the whole issue of slavery.  Article quote:  "After the predictable firestorm of criticism, McDonnell allowed that it must have been a mistake not to mention slavery in his proclamation..."

Gee, ya think?! 

Look, I'm Southern. My family has been in the deep South since the late 1700s.  I know all of the rationalizations and mental gymnastics Southerners go through to romanticize the Antebellum South.  And... it's wrong.  And disingenous.  And, quite honestly, intellectually-speaking, it's dangerous.  Would we be so sanguine over Nazis romanticizing their history?  I think not.

From the linked article:

"It would be immensely useful for [southerners] generally to spend some time reflecting on the century or so of grinding poverty and cultural isolation that fidelity to the Romance in Gray earned for the entire region, regardless of race. Few Americans from any region know much about the actual history of Reconstruction..."

This is so very true. And one of the things that disturbs me about this (one of.  There are many) is that it shows the failure of our education system and brings to mind the textbook crap going on in Texas. It's basically cliche to say that the victors write history, but there's truth in that cliche and the problem with it is that in writing history we change it, massage it, and -- in a way -- create it.  Because if our massaged-to-fit-our-sensitivities version of history is the one that is taught, then history is misremembered and kids grow up believing this crap.  If the misremembered 'history' is all that is generally known, it becomes 'history.'  And if all we know is false history, we have learned nothing.

[Reminds me of a comic bit I saw on Colbert recently where in response to a guest saying that a people who do not know their history are doomed to repeat it.  Colbert said that it seemed to him that if we make up history, that should solve that problem.  Hahaha... no.]

And on this topic, let me rec the book Lies My Teacher Told Me .  It's a really good book exploring many topics regarding what we misremeber of our history, be it the downfall of the American Whig party (we had Whigs?) to far more recent events. The whole 'Confederate History Month' thing brought that book to mind because one of the things I remember from it is that this whole "We fought for state's rights" is delusional bullshit. 

No, 'we' (as in Southerners) really didn't.

And if we really want to cast the Civil War as being about state's rights.  Guess what?  It wasn't the Confederacy fighting for them.  The Confederacy was fighting against them!   The South's fidelity to "state rights" largely came about post-war when the South was enacting Jim Crow laws and didn't want anyone telling them that they couldn't. 

John C. Calhoun, Senator and 7th Vice President (and one of the 'great' villains of history IMHO) did a lot of the groundwork leading into the Civil War (even if he died before seeing it).  Instrumental in that groundword were the runaway slave laws where even if a slave escaped a slave state and made it to a state where slavery was illegal, the South wanted the slave laws upheld and the escaped slave sent back into slavery.  So, basically, he/they wanted slave laws enforced in states that did not have slave laws.  Er... so what about that?  State Rights only count on laws when they suit you? When you can select which state's laws are used?

The thing is, many of the rationalizations regarding the war and often used in the way we teach that the war wasn't 'just about slavery' are indeed true:

State rights were a factor (since it was about whether new states would have slavery or not and whether or not slaves that escaped slave owning states would be sent back to slave owning states).  

Economics was a factor (because the Southern agricultural economy was based in and necessitated slavery to maintain). 

And it was about politics (because we had crazy, irrational people involved in government then too. See Congressman, Senator, Vice President John C. Calhoun of South Carolina strong, powerful advocate of the 1850 Fugitive Slave Law , the 'Compromise' of 1850 and who once gave a speech on the floor of the Senate that slavery was good

"We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions. To maintain the existing relations between the two races, inhabiting that section of the Union, is indispensable to the peace and happiness of both. It cannot be subverted without drenching the country or the other of the races. . . . But let me not be understood as admitting, even by implication, that the existing relations between the two races in the slaveholding States is an evil:—far otherwise; I hold it to be a good, as it has thus far proved itself to be to both, and will continue to prove so if not disturbed by the fell spirit of abolition..."

But if you notice the common factor in all of it -- it's slavery.  So for the present governor of Virgina to declare "Confederate History Month" and  --oops!-- forget about slavery is just such massive bullshit.   Slavery was written into the Confederate Consitution!  And, while it is true that the vast majority of Confederate soldiers never owned a slave, we see protestors today holding up signs saying "Don't raise my taxes!" when 95% of the U.S. population just got a tax cut.   They don't think they're protesting on behalf of Wall Street Bankers million dollar bonuses (or pehaps they do.  These days you never can tell), but... um... they sort of are.   It doesn't have to make sense.  All that it requires is that people believe it...which is why mis-remembering the Civil War is truly epic fail.  A lot of blood was spilled.  The least we can do is LEARN from it. 

If there's a Confederate History Month, it would behoove a lot of people to learn what in the hell they're talking about rather than perpetrating self-comforting myths (but I'm not holding my breath on that happening.)
shipperx: (Doctor Who - 10 and rose)
Watched the HBO movie Eddington and Einstein last night while struggling with my computer (damn thing wouldn't work. It would find the wifi and would say that it couldn't find the internet. Internet provider said they could see my modem and could ping so that wasn't the problem. Ultimately (::fingers crossed:: I think it was just a cable. When I replaced it this morning it finally decided to work again).

Anyway, over all, the movie was pretty good. Plus, Tennant! That said, the movie is also an instance of if you know your history, you begin to say "Wait! That's not the way it happened!" ExpandRead more... )
shipperx: (Doctor Who - 10 and rose)
Watched the HBO movie Eddington and Einstein last night while struggling with my computer (damn thing wouldn't work. It would find the wifi and would say that it couldn't find the internet. Internet provider said they could see my modem and could ping so that wasn't the problem. Ultimately (::fingers crossed:: I think it was just a cable. When I replaced it this morning it finally decided to work again).

Anyway, over all, the movie was pretty good. Plus, Tennant! That said, the movie is also an instance of if you know your history, you begin to say "Wait! That's not the way it happened!" ExpandRead more... )
shipperx: (Doctor Who - 10 and rose)
Watched the HBO movie Eddington and Einstein last night while struggling with my computer (damn thing wouldn't work. It would find the wifi and would say that it couldn't find the internet. Internet provider said they could see my modem and could ping so that wasn't the problem. Ultimately (::fingers crossed:: I think it was just a cable. When I replaced it this morning it finally decided to work again).

Anyway, over all, the movie was pretty good. Plus, Tennant! That said, the movie is also an instance of if you know your history, you begin to say "Wait! That's not the way it happened!" ExpandRead more... )
shipperx: (Tudors-lady killer)

From AOL News:

(Feb. 16) -- The most famous of all pharaohs was a frail and sickly king who walked with a cane and suffered from a painful bone disease and a club foot. But it may have been a severe case of malaria that finally killed him, according to groundbreaking new genetic analysis.

A team of researchers from Egypt, Germany and Italy also developed a definitive family tree for King Tutankhamun, including the identity of his father and grandparents and the two still-born fetuses found in his tomb. The genealogy also confirms that Tut's family was largely the product of in-breeding.

(Tutankhamun was only 19 when he died, circa 1324 BC, after a nine-year reign over Egypt's New Kingdom. His death marked the end of his family's 200-year rule, which was then replaced by a military regime. )

More than 3,000 years later, Tut and 10 other royal mummies have undergone a two-year examination by the research team. The work has been ongoing at a $5 million, custom-designed DNA lab in Cairo, paid for by the Discovery Channel, which will broadcast two films about the project.

"It's incredibly difficult to obtain the kind of access to the mummies we did, and this has been years in the making," Dr. Carsten Pusch, lead study author from the University of Tübingen, said in an interview with AOL News. "The Egyptians are very proud of their history; they don't want foreign people invading that."

The DNA tests determined that King Tut had a clubbed left foot and no use of his right foot, because he suffered from a lack of blood flow that leads to collapsed bones (avascular necrosis). Those ailments explain why 130 wooden sticks and staffs were found in his tomb.

The conditions would have weakened his body and immune system, but they wouldn't have been enough to kill him. Rather, the team suspects that Tut sustained a fall -- which explains the head trauma and broken leg discovered in a 1968 X-ray -- and succumbed to a serious malarial infection.

Tut and four other mummies tested positive for malaria tropica, the most severe form of the illness.

The Nile region where Tut lived was marshy and humid -- the perfect breeding grounds for mosquitoes, which carry the malaria virus. DNA evidence is likely the strongest possible evidence available in investigating such an ancient mystery, but Pusch admits that a definitive cause of death is impossible.

"Announcing a sure cause of death, 3,000 years afterward, is too much," he said. "What we do know is that King Tut suffered from many illnesses that may have combined to lead to such a premature death.

"Everybody knows the golden mask, but his was not an easy, glamorous life."

Until the latest tests were performed, the king's lineage also was widely disputed. These tests confirm that his father was Akhenaten, a revolutionary pharaoh known for introducing monotheistic religion. Tut's mother, whom many speculate was Queen Nefertiti, remains unidentified -- still known as Mummy KV35YL.

DNA analysis has yet to identify KV35YL but did conclude that the unnamed mummy is the sister of Akhenaten, as well as his mating partner.

Some also speculated that Queen Tiye, a wife of Akhenaten whose body was also embalmed alongside Tut's, was the young pharaoh's mother. In fact, the tests revealed, she was his grandmother.

The two still-born bodies in Tut's tomb, once thought to have been his half-siblings, have been identified as his children.

Pusch suspects that a long history of in-breeding might be responsible for the premature deaths of Tut's offspring.

"In-breeding in successive generations reduces genetic fitness," he said. "This would also explain many of Tut's own physical ailments, which might be caused by the sibling relationship between his mother and father."

Researchers have only scratched the surface of readily available DNA from ancient Egyptian mummies. Work at Cairo's DNA laboratory will continue, and Pusch hopes to find secrets from other famous dynasties. King Tut and Co. offered readily available DNA samples, but Pusch cautions that other bodies might not be so well-preserved.

"If it were a question of being overly invasive, then we'd stop the testing," he said. "Save those secrets for future generations, when they can use new advancements to cause less damage."

Knowing the secrets of King Tut's life, lineage and death lends a new perspective to royal life in Ancient Egypt, if you ask Pusch. "At first, he was a specimen in a museum, but now he's become a person I know intimately," he said. "His was a painful life and one of suffering.

"Not very royal, is it?"
shipperx: (Tudors-lady killer)

From AOL News:

(Feb. 16) -- The most famous of all pharaohs was a frail and sickly king who walked with a cane and suffered from a painful bone disease and a club foot. But it may have been a severe case of malaria that finally killed him, according to groundbreaking new genetic analysis.

A team of researchers from Egypt, Germany and Italy also developed a definitive family tree for King Tutankhamun, including the identity of his father and grandparents and the two still-born fetuses found in his tomb. The genealogy also confirms that Tut's family was largely the product of in-breeding.

(Tutankhamun was only 19 when he died, circa 1324 BC, after a nine-year reign over Egypt's New Kingdom. His death marked the end of his family's 200-year rule, which was then replaced by a military regime. )

More than 3,000 years later, Tut and 10 other royal mummies have undergone a two-year examination by the research team. The work has been ongoing at a $5 million, custom-designed DNA lab in Cairo, paid for by the Discovery Channel, which will broadcast two films about the project.

"It's incredibly difficult to obtain the kind of access to the mummies we did, and this has been years in the making," Dr. Carsten Pusch, lead study author from the University of Tübingen, said in an interview with AOL News. "The Egyptians are very proud of their history; they don't want foreign people invading that."

The DNA tests determined that King Tut had a clubbed left foot and no use of his right foot, because he suffered from a lack of blood flow that leads to collapsed bones (avascular necrosis). Those ailments explain why 130 wooden sticks and staffs were found in his tomb.

The conditions would have weakened his body and immune system, but they wouldn't have been enough to kill him. Rather, the team suspects that Tut sustained a fall -- which explains the head trauma and broken leg discovered in a 1968 X-ray -- and succumbed to a serious malarial infection.

Tut and four other mummies tested positive for malaria tropica, the most severe form of the illness.

The Nile region where Tut lived was marshy and humid -- the perfect breeding grounds for mosquitoes, which carry the malaria virus. DNA evidence is likely the strongest possible evidence available in investigating such an ancient mystery, but Pusch admits that a definitive cause of death is impossible.

"Announcing a sure cause of death, 3,000 years afterward, is too much," he said. "What we do know is that King Tut suffered from many illnesses that may have combined to lead to such a premature death.

"Everybody knows the golden mask, but his was not an easy, glamorous life."

Until the latest tests were performed, the king's lineage also was widely disputed. These tests confirm that his father was Akhenaten, a revolutionary pharaoh known for introducing monotheistic religion. Tut's mother, whom many speculate was Queen Nefertiti, remains unidentified -- still known as Mummy KV35YL.

DNA analysis has yet to identify KV35YL but did conclude that the unnamed mummy is the sister of Akhenaten, as well as his mating partner.

Some also speculated that Queen Tiye, a wife of Akhenaten whose body was also embalmed alongside Tut's, was the young pharaoh's mother. In fact, the tests revealed, she was his grandmother.

The two still-born bodies in Tut's tomb, once thought to have been his half-siblings, have been identified as his children.

Pusch suspects that a long history of in-breeding might be responsible for the premature deaths of Tut's offspring.

"In-breeding in successive generations reduces genetic fitness," he said. "This would also explain many of Tut's own physical ailments, which might be caused by the sibling relationship between his mother and father."

Researchers have only scratched the surface of readily available DNA from ancient Egyptian mummies. Work at Cairo's DNA laboratory will continue, and Pusch hopes to find secrets from other famous dynasties. King Tut and Co. offered readily available DNA samples, but Pusch cautions that other bodies might not be so well-preserved.

"If it were a question of being overly invasive, then we'd stop the testing," he said. "Save those secrets for future generations, when they can use new advancements to cause less damage."

Knowing the secrets of King Tut's life, lineage and death lends a new perspective to royal life in Ancient Egypt, if you ask Pusch. "At first, he was a specimen in a museum, but now he's become a person I know intimately," he said. "His was a painful life and one of suffering.

"Not very royal, is it?"
shipperx: (Tudors-lady killer)

From AOL News:

(Feb. 16) -- The most famous of all pharaohs was a frail and sickly king who walked with a cane and suffered from a painful bone disease and a club foot. But it may have been a severe case of malaria that finally killed him, according to groundbreaking new genetic analysis.

A team of researchers from Egypt, Germany and Italy also developed a definitive family tree for King Tutankhamun, including the identity of his father and grandparents and the two still-born fetuses found in his tomb. The genealogy also confirms that Tut's family was largely the product of in-breeding.

(Tutankhamun was only 19 when he died, circa 1324 BC, after a nine-year reign over Egypt's New Kingdom. His death marked the end of his family's 200-year rule, which was then replaced by a military regime. )

More than 3,000 years later, Tut and 10 other royal mummies have undergone a two-year examination by the research team. The work has been ongoing at a $5 million, custom-designed DNA lab in Cairo, paid for by the Discovery Channel, which will broadcast two films about the project.

"It's incredibly difficult to obtain the kind of access to the mummies we did, and this has been years in the making," Dr. Carsten Pusch, lead study author from the University of Tübingen, said in an interview with AOL News. "The Egyptians are very proud of their history; they don't want foreign people invading that."

The DNA tests determined that King Tut had a clubbed left foot and no use of his right foot, because he suffered from a lack of blood flow that leads to collapsed bones (avascular necrosis). Those ailments explain why 130 wooden sticks and staffs were found in his tomb.

The conditions would have weakened his body and immune system, but they wouldn't have been enough to kill him. Rather, the team suspects that Tut sustained a fall -- which explains the head trauma and broken leg discovered in a 1968 X-ray -- and succumbed to a serious malarial infection.

Tut and four other mummies tested positive for malaria tropica, the most severe form of the illness.

The Nile region where Tut lived was marshy and humid -- the perfect breeding grounds for mosquitoes, which carry the malaria virus. DNA evidence is likely the strongest possible evidence available in investigating such an ancient mystery, but Pusch admits that a definitive cause of death is impossible.

"Announcing a sure cause of death, 3,000 years afterward, is too much," he said. "What we do know is that King Tut suffered from many illnesses that may have combined to lead to such a premature death.

"Everybody knows the golden mask, but his was not an easy, glamorous life."

Until the latest tests were performed, the king's lineage also was widely disputed. These tests confirm that his father was Akhenaten, a revolutionary pharaoh known for introducing monotheistic religion. Tut's mother, whom many speculate was Queen Nefertiti, remains unidentified -- still known as Mummy KV35YL.

DNA analysis has yet to identify KV35YL but did conclude that the unnamed mummy is the sister of Akhenaten, as well as his mating partner.

Some also speculated that Queen Tiye, a wife of Akhenaten whose body was also embalmed alongside Tut's, was the young pharaoh's mother. In fact, the tests revealed, she was his grandmother.

The two still-born bodies in Tut's tomb, once thought to have been his half-siblings, have been identified as his children.

Pusch suspects that a long history of in-breeding might be responsible for the premature deaths of Tut's offspring.

"In-breeding in successive generations reduces genetic fitness," he said. "This would also explain many of Tut's own physical ailments, which might be caused by the sibling relationship between his mother and father."

Researchers have only scratched the surface of readily available DNA from ancient Egyptian mummies. Work at Cairo's DNA laboratory will continue, and Pusch hopes to find secrets from other famous dynasties. King Tut and Co. offered readily available DNA samples, but Pusch cautions that other bodies might not be so well-preserved.

"If it were a question of being overly invasive, then we'd stop the testing," he said. "Save those secrets for future generations, when they can use new advancements to cause less damage."

Knowing the secrets of King Tut's life, lineage and death lends a new perspective to royal life in Ancient Egypt, if you ask Pusch. "At first, he was a specimen in a museum, but now he's become a person I know intimately," he said. "His was a painful life and one of suffering.

"Not very royal, is it?"
shipperx: (Star Trek: Spock/Uhura)
It's not often (okay almost never) that an article on sci-fi actually makes you feel something, but this article about Nichelle Nichols (Star Trek, Uhura) meeting Dr. Martin Luther King. (link gakked from [livejournal.com profile] killerweasel ).
shipperx: (Star Trek: Spock/Uhura)
It's not often (okay almost never) that an article on sci-fi actually makes you feel something, but this article about Nichelle Nichols (Star Trek, Uhura) meeting Dr. Martin Luther King. (link gakked from [livejournal.com profile] killerweasel ).
shipperx: (Star Trek: Spock/Uhura)
It's not often (okay almost never) that an article on sci-fi actually makes you feel something, but this article about Nichelle Nichols (Star Trek, Uhura) meeting Dr. Martin Luther King. (link gakked from [livejournal.com profile] killerweasel ).
shipperx: (FNL Life Coach)
This incident has, for years, been woven into Bear lore. There was an HBO documentary earlier this year about integration in the South that incorporated it. And certainly it passed into school mythology/popular wisdom quite some time ago (Along with the legend -- which the HBO documentary made sound plausible and quite possibly true-- that Bear had deliberatly scheduled the game hoping for exactly this result. He had been a quiet proponent for integration for years, dating back to his days as a coach for Kentucky.) Anyway, interesting Wall Street Journal article.


ExpandThe loss that changed a state )
he sure wasn't thinking about the historical significance of the day: This was the first time a fully integrated team had come to play Alabama in the South.

"It wasn't the first time I'd played an all-white football team, so that didn't bother me at all," says Mr. Cunningham, who is black. "It was my first road trip, first varsity game. I was more concerned about getting a chance to play and not making any mistakes."

The game, a 42-21 Trojans rout, couldn't have left a stronger impression on the Alabama faithful. ExpandRead more... )

Alabama's football program established itself more than 100 years ago and established itself nationally more than 80 years ago, becoming the South's flagship team when it went west and won the 1926 Rose Bowl. The Tide excelled in the Depression years and won three national titles in the 1960s under Mr. Bryant. But the slowness of the South to accept integration hurt the Tide, culminating in that pivotal season opening loss against USC.

The legend of that night, which has become known as the Cunningham game, has been exaggerated, misremembered, and mythologized. Books overstate Mr. Cunningham's yards and touchdowns. Mr. Cunningham is famously said to have done more to integrate Alabama in 60 minutes than Martin Luther King Jr. did in 20 years. Aside from whether he did or not, the quote is alternately attributed to Mr. Bryant and two former assistants. "I've been here 20 years," says Taylor Watson, curator of the Paul "Bear" Bryant Museum in Tuscaloosa, "and I've never been able to figure it out."

According to myth, Mr. Bryant took Mr. Cunningham to the Tide locker room after the game to show his team what a great football player looks like. Mr. Cunningham says Mr. Bryant did make the unusual gesture of speaking with him after the game but just to congratulate him.

But the game did have dramatic effects. Historians say Mr. Bryant—who already had a black player on Alabama's freshman team— would have added more black players sooner if it had been socially acceptable; after that game, fans recognized the need. Great black players soon started coming to Alabama, including future pro Hall of Fame tight end Ozzie Newsome. The Tide rebounded to win three more national championships under Mr. Bryant, who died in 1983.


Today, two black Alabama players are among the most adored Crimson Tide stars in recent memory. Sophomore running back Mark Ingram is in the running for the Heisman, and sophomore receiver Julio Jones was elected to a student-government seat after last season. [Me: What? No mention of hulking teddy bear Mt. Cody? Cody is wildly popular. And he single-handedly saved the Tennessee game.]

"I'm just amazed how much the landscape has changed since the late '60s," Mr. Cunningham says. "At the time, I didn't dwell upon how big a deal it was. If I'd thought any further out, I might not have played as well as I did. But seeing the results over the past 40 years, we left an impression on college football and Alabama."

ExpandRead more... )
shipperx: (FNL Life Coach)
This incident has, for years, been woven into Bear lore. There was an HBO documentary earlier this year about integration in the South that incorporated it. And certainly it passed into school mythology/popular wisdom quite some time ago (Along with the legend -- which the HBO documentary made sound plausible and quite possibly true-- that Bear had deliberatly scheduled the game hoping for exactly this result. He had been a quiet proponent for integration for years, dating back to his days as a coach for Kentucky.) Anyway, interesting Wall Street Journal article.


ExpandThe loss that changed a state )
he sure wasn't thinking about the historical significance of the day: This was the first time a fully integrated team had come to play Alabama in the South.

"It wasn't the first time I'd played an all-white football team, so that didn't bother me at all," says Mr. Cunningham, who is black. "It was my first road trip, first varsity game. I was more concerned about getting a chance to play and not making any mistakes."

The game, a 42-21 Trojans rout, couldn't have left a stronger impression on the Alabama faithful. ExpandRead more... )

Alabama's football program established itself more than 100 years ago and established itself nationally more than 80 years ago, becoming the South's flagship team when it went west and won the 1926 Rose Bowl. The Tide excelled in the Depression years and won three national titles in the 1960s under Mr. Bryant. But the slowness of the South to accept integration hurt the Tide, culminating in that pivotal season opening loss against USC.

The legend of that night, which has become known as the Cunningham game, has been exaggerated, misremembered, and mythologized. Books overstate Mr. Cunningham's yards and touchdowns. Mr. Cunningham is famously said to have done more to integrate Alabama in 60 minutes than Martin Luther King Jr. did in 20 years. Aside from whether he did or not, the quote is alternately attributed to Mr. Bryant and two former assistants. "I've been here 20 years," says Taylor Watson, curator of the Paul "Bear" Bryant Museum in Tuscaloosa, "and I've never been able to figure it out."

According to myth, Mr. Bryant took Mr. Cunningham to the Tide locker room after the game to show his team what a great football player looks like. Mr. Cunningham says Mr. Bryant did make the unusual gesture of speaking with him after the game but just to congratulate him.

But the game did have dramatic effects. Historians say Mr. Bryant—who already had a black player on Alabama's freshman team— would have added more black players sooner if it had been socially acceptable; after that game, fans recognized the need. Great black players soon started coming to Alabama, including future pro Hall of Fame tight end Ozzie Newsome. The Tide rebounded to win three more national championships under Mr. Bryant, who died in 1983.


Today, two black Alabama players are among the most adored Crimson Tide stars in recent memory. Sophomore running back Mark Ingram is in the running for the Heisman, and sophomore receiver Julio Jones was elected to a student-government seat after last season. [Me: What? No mention of hulking teddy bear Mt. Cody? Cody is wildly popular. And he single-handedly saved the Tennessee game.]

"I'm just amazed how much the landscape has changed since the late '60s," Mr. Cunningham says. "At the time, I didn't dwell upon how big a deal it was. If I'd thought any further out, I might not have played as well as I did. But seeing the results over the past 40 years, we left an impression on college football and Alabama."

ExpandRead more... )
shipperx: (FNL Life Coach)
This incident has, for years, been woven into Bear lore. There was an HBO documentary earlier this year about integration in the South that incorporated it. And certainly it passed into school mythology/popular wisdom quite some time ago (Along with the legend -- which the HBO documentary made sound plausible and quite possibly true-- that Bear had deliberatly scheduled the game hoping for exactly this result. He had been a quiet proponent for integration for years, dating back to his days as a coach for Kentucky.) Anyway, interesting Wall Street Journal article.


ExpandThe loss that changed a state )
he sure wasn't thinking about the historical significance of the day: This was the first time a fully integrated team had come to play Alabama in the South.

"It wasn't the first time I'd played an all-white football team, so that didn't bother me at all," says Mr. Cunningham, who is black. "It was my first road trip, first varsity game. I was more concerned about getting a chance to play and not making any mistakes."

The game, a 42-21 Trojans rout, couldn't have left a stronger impression on the Alabama faithful. ExpandRead more... )

Alabama's football program established itself more than 100 years ago and established itself nationally more than 80 years ago, becoming the South's flagship team when it went west and won the 1926 Rose Bowl. The Tide excelled in the Depression years and won three national titles in the 1960s under Mr. Bryant. But the slowness of the South to accept integration hurt the Tide, culminating in that pivotal season opening loss against USC.

The legend of that night, which has become known as the Cunningham game, has been exaggerated, misremembered, and mythologized. Books overstate Mr. Cunningham's yards and touchdowns. Mr. Cunningham is famously said to have done more to integrate Alabama in 60 minutes than Martin Luther King Jr. did in 20 years. Aside from whether he did or not, the quote is alternately attributed to Mr. Bryant and two former assistants. "I've been here 20 years," says Taylor Watson, curator of the Paul "Bear" Bryant Museum in Tuscaloosa, "and I've never been able to figure it out."

According to myth, Mr. Bryant took Mr. Cunningham to the Tide locker room after the game to show his team what a great football player looks like. Mr. Cunningham says Mr. Bryant did make the unusual gesture of speaking with him after the game but just to congratulate him.

But the game did have dramatic effects. Historians say Mr. Bryant—who already had a black player on Alabama's freshman team— would have added more black players sooner if it had been socially acceptable; after that game, fans recognized the need. Great black players soon started coming to Alabama, including future pro Hall of Fame tight end Ozzie Newsome. The Tide rebounded to win three more national championships under Mr. Bryant, who died in 1983.


Today, two black Alabama players are among the most adored Crimson Tide stars in recent memory. Sophomore running back Mark Ingram is in the running for the Heisman, and sophomore receiver Julio Jones was elected to a student-government seat after last season. [Me: What? No mention of hulking teddy bear Mt. Cody? Cody is wildly popular. And he single-handedly saved the Tennessee game.]

"I'm just amazed how much the landscape has changed since the late '60s," Mr. Cunningham says. "At the time, I didn't dwell upon how big a deal it was. If I'd thought any further out, I might not have played as well as I did. But seeing the results over the past 40 years, we left an impression on college football and Alabama."

ExpandRead more... )
shipperx: (Fallen From Grace)
Art Historians Claim Van Gogh's Ear 'Cut Off by Gauguin'

Vincent van Gogh's fame may owe as much to a legendary act of self-harm, as it does to his self-portraits. But, 119 years after his death, the tortured post-Impressionist's bloody ear is at the centre of a new controversy, after two historians suggested that the painter did not hack off his own lobe but was attacked by his friend, the French artist Paul Gauguin.

Expandrest of article )

Interesting. You know how you develop impressions of historical figures? The impression may be entirely wrong as they're based on historical accounts we've read and, as the saying goes 'history is written by the victors'. That said, my impression has long been that Gauguin was a selfish asshole and that Van Gogh was a tragic, mentally disturbed but genuinely decent human being. Given Van Gogh's background (or what I remember of it from art history and the lasting impression that it left) it doesn't sound wildly out of character forVan Gogh to have covered for Gauguin and take the blame. Van Gogh is, after all, the guy who committed suicide to save his brother the expense of his medical care.
shipperx: (Fallen From Grace)
Art Historians Claim Van Gogh's Ear 'Cut Off by Gauguin'

Vincent van Gogh's fame may owe as much to a legendary act of self-harm, as it does to his self-portraits. But, 119 years after his death, the tortured post-Impressionist's bloody ear is at the centre of a new controversy, after two historians suggested that the painter did not hack off his own lobe but was attacked by his friend, the French artist Paul Gauguin.

Expandrest of article )

Interesting. You know how you develop impressions of historical figures? The impression may be entirely wrong as they're based on historical accounts we've read and, as the saying goes 'history is written by the victors'. That said, my impression has long been that Gauguin was a selfish asshole and that Van Gogh was a tragic, mentally disturbed but genuinely decent human being. Given Van Gogh's background (or what I remember of it from art history and the lasting impression that it left) it doesn't sound wildly out of character forVan Gogh to have covered for Gauguin and take the blame. Van Gogh is, after all, the guy who committed suicide to save his brother the expense of his medical care.
shipperx: (Fallen From Grace)
Art Historians Claim Van Gogh's Ear 'Cut Off by Gauguin'

Vincent van Gogh's fame may owe as much to a legendary act of self-harm, as it does to his self-portraits. But, 119 years after his death, the tortured post-Impressionist's bloody ear is at the centre of a new controversy, after two historians suggested that the painter did not hack off his own lobe but was attacked by his friend, the French artist Paul Gauguin.

Expandrest of article )

Interesting. You know how you develop impressions of historical figures? The impression may be entirely wrong as they're based on historical accounts we've read and, as the saying goes 'history is written by the victors'. That said, my impression has long been that Gauguin was a selfish asshole and that Van Gogh was a tragic, mentally disturbed but genuinely decent human being. Given Van Gogh's background (or what I remember of it from art history and the lasting impression that it left) it doesn't sound wildly out of character forVan Gogh to have covered for Gauguin and take the blame. Van Gogh is, after all, the guy who committed suicide to save his brother the expense of his medical care.

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24 252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

Expand All Cut TagsCollapse All Cut Tags
Page generated Aug. 1st, 2025 06:54 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios