Plus, He Looks Awesome in Blue Jammies

Your James is Charlemagne Bolivar from Andromeda.

Your James is a strong and powerful man, secure in
himself and in your love.


Which James Marsters is for you?
brought to you by Quizilla

Plus, He Looks Awesome in Blue Jammies

Your James is Charlemagne Bolivar from Andromeda.

Your James is a strong and powerful man, secure in
himself and in your love.


Which James Marsters is for you?
brought to you by Quizilla

Plus, He Looks Awesome in Blue Jammies

Your James is Charlemagne Bolivar from Andromeda.

Your James is a strong and powerful man, secure in
himself and in your love.


Which James Marsters is for you?
brought to you by Quizilla

Geez! Dude, get over it!

Remember this guy, the one who became upset because I said he sounded like an ass after I read a copy of his review of the AtS Season 5 DVD? You know, the article on the website I never visited. The guy who I never wrote to (much less sent a complaint e-mail to. Or...hell... anything to). But who read a five sentence response I posted on BAPS (totally unrelated, Spike-centric site). After all the guy spent the bulk of his AtS Season 5 DVD review complaining about Spike on BtVS and I thought that was ridiculous and said so on BAPS. BAPS, mind you.

That guy wrote me an unsolicited e-mail claiming that he wasn't an ass, etc. ( that I posted about here). Of course--let me repeat-- there's the little fact that I had never written the man, and had never visited or posted on his site. I hadn't even visited the Usenet Angel Newsgroup and had, in fact, only posted a few short (albeit snarky) lines on BAPS, yet somehow this guy felt compelled to personally contact me with a page long letter explaining how he really wasn't an ass even though he had spent most of his (supposedly professional) 'article' about AtS complaining about Spike on BtVS.

My response to his personal e-mail to me was brief--did he really feel the need to track me down and write a private e-mail because I had disagreed with the review?

Huh. Guess he really didn't get the clue that the first e-mail he sent came off as... well... kind of pathetic, because he's done it again! He's sent me another long ass letter defending his dislike of Spike, and explaining how he really isn't pathetic for tracking me down and responding to me personally over a four line post I wrote a month ago...on a board that wasn't related to his site!

Sheesh! Dude, here's a clue -- I don't care who you are. I don't care what you think. I don't care that you dislike Spike. I don't care that you can't handle the fact that I think your review sounded like a braying ass. I don't know who you are. I don't want to know who you are. And I don't really care if it bruises your fragile ego that I thought your review sucked. Get over it! Grow up. Go away. For a supposedly 'professional' reviewer, you're behaving like a petulant child.

What's with this guy?


ETA: As for today's ubiquitous debate topic regarding Terri Shiavo, I'm not writing anything, just pointing to kellyhk's post here I tend to side with the medical community in these cases.

Geez! Dude, get over it!

Remember this guy, the one who became upset because I said he sounded like an ass after I read a copy of his review of the AtS Season 5 DVD? You know, the article on the website I never visited. The guy who I never wrote to (much less sent a complaint e-mail to. Or...hell... anything to). But who read a five sentence response I posted on BAPS (totally unrelated, Spike-centric site). After all the guy spent the bulk of his AtS Season 5 DVD review complaining about Spike on BtVS and I thought that was ridiculous and said so on BAPS. BAPS, mind you.

That guy wrote me an unsolicited e-mail claiming that he wasn't an ass, etc. ( that I posted about here). Of course--let me repeat-- there's the little fact that I had never written the man, and had never visited or posted on his site. I hadn't even visited the Usenet Angel Newsgroup and had, in fact, only posted a few short (albeit snarky) lines on BAPS, yet somehow this guy felt compelled to personally contact me with a page long letter explaining how he really wasn't an ass even though he had spent most of his (supposedly professional) 'article' about AtS complaining about Spike on BtVS.

My response to his personal e-mail to me was brief--did he really feel the need to track me down and write a private e-mail because I had disagreed with the review?

Huh. Guess he really didn't get the clue that the first e-mail he sent came off as... well... kind of pathetic, because he's done it again! He's sent me another long ass letter defending his dislike of Spike, and explaining how he really isn't pathetic for tracking me down and responding to me personally over a four line post I wrote a month ago...on a board that wasn't related to his site!

Sheesh! Dude, here's a clue -- I don't care who you are. I don't care what you think. I don't care that you dislike Spike. I don't care that you can't handle the fact that I think your review sounded like a braying ass. I don't know who you are. I don't want to know who you are. And I don't really care if it bruises your fragile ego that I thought your review sucked. Get over it! Grow up. Go away. For a supposedly 'professional' reviewer, you're behaving like a petulant child.

What's with this guy?


ETA: As for today's ubiquitous debate topic regarding Terri Shiavo, I'm not writing anything, just pointing to kellyhk's post here I tend to side with the medical community in these cases.

Geez! Dude, get over it!

Remember this guy, the one who became upset because I said he sounded like an ass after I read a copy of his review of the AtS Season 5 DVD? You know, the article on the website I never visited. The guy who I never wrote to (much less sent a complaint e-mail to. Or...hell... anything to). But who read a five sentence response I posted on BAPS (totally unrelated, Spike-centric site). After all the guy spent the bulk of his AtS Season 5 DVD review complaining about Spike on BtVS and I thought that was ridiculous and said so on BAPS. BAPS, mind you.

That guy wrote me an unsolicited e-mail claiming that he wasn't an ass, etc. ( that I posted about here). Of course--let me repeat-- there's the little fact that I had never written the man, and had never visited or posted on his site. I hadn't even visited the Usenet Angel Newsgroup and had, in fact, only posted a few short (albeit snarky) lines on BAPS, yet somehow this guy felt compelled to personally contact me with a page long letter explaining how he really wasn't an ass even though he had spent most of his (supposedly professional) 'article' about AtS complaining about Spike on BtVS.

My response to his personal e-mail to me was brief--did he really feel the need to track me down and write a private e-mail because I had disagreed with the review?

Huh. Guess he really didn't get the clue that the first e-mail he sent came off as... well... kind of pathetic, because he's done it again! He's sent me another long ass letter defending his dislike of Spike, and explaining how he really isn't pathetic for tracking me down and responding to me personally over a four line post I wrote a month ago...on a board that wasn't related to his site!

Sheesh! Dude, here's a clue -- I don't care who you are. I don't care what you think. I don't care that you dislike Spike. I don't care that you can't handle the fact that I think your review sounded like a braying ass. I don't know who you are. I don't want to know who you are. And I don't really care if it bruises your fragile ego that I thought your review sucked. Get over it! Grow up. Go away. For a supposedly 'professional' reviewer, you're behaving like a petulant child.

What's with this guy?


ETA: As for today's ubiquitous debate topic regarding Terri Shiavo, I'm not writing anything, just pointing to kellyhk's post here I tend to side with the medical community in these cases.