I just racked up a new "warning" on TWOP for pointing out that stating that a woman won an episode of Top Chef "because of her boobs" might not be a critical assessment of her skills. Hell, I didn't even criticize the poster outright (and god knows I wanted to point out that statements like that are sexist as hell) I simply said that personally I'd shy away from making such statements because readers could perceive it as sexist even if the poster didn't intend it to be (which, honestly, how is it not sexist?). I tapdanced around the fact that it's offensively sexist to summarize and dismiss a win in a cooking contest by saying "She won because of her boobs." (And that's a quote.) And I got the warning? Whatever happened to "stick to the facts"? Was it a "fact" that she won because she had boobies? No one can hold up their hands and say "Whoa! I think it might not be so great to judge a woman by her discretely covered mammary glands that have nothing at all to do with this contest?"
It's TWOP.
Why do I expect things to make sense?
It's TWOP.
Why do I expect things to make sense?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 11:05 pm (UTC)I did love a post made after last week where a "She won the MacBook because of her boobs!" was answered with something like "They had another prize waiting in case anyone else was at the top, then?"
no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 11:23 pm (UTC)The issues on that message board, they swarm like mayflies.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 12:54 am (UTC)Have I missed the issue with a cook pulling her hair back from her face and tying it into a pony tail? Wha-huh?! God forbid a professional chef try to be neat and clean in her personal habits.
Seriously, what's up with criticizing her pulling her hair back like that? I've boggled at the protests over her hair ever time. What the hell does her hair matter as long as it's not in the food?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-13 11:19 pm (UTC)And yeah, TWoP's become obnoxious with how they now allow stupidity but no pointing out of said stupidity. Let's drive away the smart posters so the idiots can feel free to post without worry.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 12:51 am (UTC)And, yeah, the defacto TWOP stance seems to be that Casey is an evil cheerleader who looks like Jennifer Anniston and that she only pretends to be helpful because deep down, beneath the professional and generally personable attitude, lurks a beeyotch.
I can understand people saying "I don't like her" because everyone has different likes. I don't understand at all why her every action is seen as some evil deception masking her evil nature. But worse than that is the general sexism of discounting wins to "they only gave it to her because of her boobs"
(And, honestly, I've never noticed her boobs. The woman is in a chef's jacket. What do these people want?!)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 12:02 am (UTC)TWOP is so contradictory and annoying. Why do I post there? I'm sick of the "Bore-dain" and "Coldickio" shit too. They dislike anyone whose snarky wit threatens to overshadow their own. Tony and Tom have both earned their bones and the right to snark at will.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 12:44 am (UTC)Criticize her food. Complain that cauliflower is farty. Say that the judging is capricious (because God knows that it is). Say that they don't like her personality that and she rubs them the wrong way. But reducing her to her boobs when she hasn't been playing off her boobs or playing up her boob or exploiting her sexualty and expressly wants to be seen as a professiona is runs darn close to misogyny for me.
Er... yeah, itpissed me off that I got warned for protesting a horribly sexist remark but posting said remark is apparently a-ok.
I'm fine with people disliking her, but when it comes to dismissing by saying "She only won for her boobs" ...as a woman, I became offended. That's not okay.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 04:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 03:04 pm (UTC)Oh. Well, shoot her then for standing up straight with her shoulders back.
But, truly, I just don't get it. This is the outfit she was wearing (I kid you not) when, supposedly, the boobs 'won' the challenge for her. http://www.bravotv.com/Top_Chef/photos/breville/index.php?id=31#pic_anchor
It's not exactly like she's Kendra the Playboy Bunny or like she's running around in a too-small bikini, here. This is the same contestant who became upset during one challenge because they were told to dress for a night out on the town in a nightclub, then told to cook, saying that it wouldn't be professional for her to cook in that kind of attire because she wouldln't be taken seriously(and she wasn't scantily clad then/ She was in dark jeans and a loose silk blouse.)
Really, the TWOP comment reeked of someone desperately trying to dismiss her as a contestant, which is why it seemed so sexist to me. Dismiss things that relate to the game. But to dismiss her on gender specific body issues when this is not a game which plays on physical attributes in any way (unlike, say, America's Next Top Model) while ignoring the skills and discounting the validity of her wins but going saying "boobies!" seems sexist as hell.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 03:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-14 02:15 pm (UTC)All in all, even though I don't root or "side" with any one contestant at this point in the game, I'm not on the "Casey is teh evol!" train either. She seems like a relatively competent chef who happens to be relatively attractive... and who has won a few of the challenges.
But she's quite unpopular. Which doesn't bother me in the general course of things. What do I care. But the pervasive sexism in dismissing her wins to "She had boobies!" annoyed the living hell out of me. What makes that an okay thing to say? Why is that kind of sexist ridiculousness tolerated? Why can no one point out "Hey! That's a really sexist thing to say!"
There's a difference between disliking someone or rooting against someone and dismissing them in a trivial and wholly sexist way. But, apparently, it's a worse crime to point this out when the contestant this would defend is someone the TWOP tide flows against.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-15 04:09 am (UTC)