Page Summary
sp23.livejournal.com - (no subject)
beer-good-foamy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flake-sake.livejournal.com - (no subject)
infinitewhale.livejournal.com - (no subject)
eilowyn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
penny-lane-42.livejournal.com - (no subject)
paratti.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sueworld2003.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ms-scarletibis.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dlgood.livejournal.com - (no subject)
probablecylon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Base style: Basic Boxes by
- Theme: Histories by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 02:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:03 pm (UTC)And it does tend to remind me of a lot of tv fanwanking that goes around, especially some of the strained Joss meta I've seen in the last ten years.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:09 pm (UTC)I'm afraid no. I still can't let go of the hope that some of the crack is intentional, but for the most part they fucked up.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:26 pm (UTC)There are times when I can almost convince myself it's some of it might be intentional.
Then one of them opens their mouths.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:27 pm (UTC)*mouth. *sigh*
no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 03:27 pm (UTC)Sorry. People have been quoting Monty Python in response to issue #35, and I, in all my American ignorance, don't get it. But at least I can make South Park references!
no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 06:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-05 10:34 pm (UTC)If you mean it as in Joss & Co sat around and purposely wrote B.S. for shits and giggles, and were shocked at how some took it so seriously, analyzing the hell out of it, etc., then no. I honestly feel like they went in with genuine intentions of telling a story, and think they're doing a good job. They are the equivalent of Butters in that ep, IMO--believing their own bullshit (though, it wasn't actually Butters' B.S...initially).
no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-06 04:54 am (UTC)For ages Gene Roddenberry was considered 'The Great Bird of the Galaxy', only to be gradually edged out of Next Gen because of his disastrous influence. All the frays and bits of machinery that kept poking through in Buffy 7 and Angel 5 poke are like horrifying compound fractures in S8 . . .