Internal Fanfic Conversation
Oct. 4th, 2004 09:41 pmHave you ever convinced yourself to do something in fanfic that the fan in you didn't want to have happen?
I have "issues" with BtVS (BOY, do I have issues). And my issues are screaming to have Spike behave in one way while the inner writer in me insists that I do the opposite. Inner fan resists not only because of said issues but also because of the crapola Joss, Fury, et al spilled over Spike with the "bad boyfriend" shinola. Anyway, while musing over the fanfic I'm always working on, it hit me that I really needed to change part of the plot. The problem is the inner fan was throwing a hissyfit at the inner writer.
Fanfic Writer: I really think Spike needs to do X.
InnerFan: No! That's not what I wanted to have happen! I didn't want Spike making the same mistake again. He was supposed to have learned something.
Fanfic Writer: Do you want him to be a Mary Sue?
InnerFan: No. But I wanted him to mature.
Fanfic Writer: Mature? Spike?! Look, can you deny that doing X is perfectly within character for Spike?
InnerFan: (Grudgingly) No.
Fanfic Writer: And would it increase tension and drama in the last third of the story?
InnerFan: (Now pouting) Yes.
Fanfic Writer: And isn't this part of the personality that made you fall for Spike in the first place?
InnerFan: Well, yeah, but Joss kept saying--
Fanfic Writer: Forget Joss! Joss had a screwed up view of what constituted heroes and what Spike needed to do to become one.
InnerFan: But Spike would be backsliding! He should--
Fanfic Writer: If you say 'evolve' I'm gonna smack you. We love, Spike, right? And why do we love him?
InnerFan: (Stubbornly Mute)
Fanfic Writer: Say it.
InnerFan: No.
Fanfic Writer: SAY IT.
InnerFan: We love "Love's Bitch."
Fanfic Writer: So Spike is gonna do X.
InnerFan: (pouting) I guess so.
* You know, I once read an article that said the imaginative process of writing sort of resembles mild schizophrenia. Please note that the schizophrenia is only mild.>:)
I have "issues" with BtVS (BOY, do I have issues). And my issues are screaming to have Spike behave in one way while the inner writer in me insists that I do the opposite. Inner fan resists not only because of said issues but also because of the crapola Joss, Fury, et al spilled over Spike with the "bad boyfriend" shinola. Anyway, while musing over the fanfic I'm always working on, it hit me that I really needed to change part of the plot. The problem is the inner fan was throwing a hissyfit at the inner writer.
Fanfic Writer: I really think Spike needs to do X.
InnerFan: No! That's not what I wanted to have happen! I didn't want Spike making the same mistake again. He was supposed to have learned something.
Fanfic Writer: Do you want him to be a Mary Sue?
InnerFan: No. But I wanted him to mature.
Fanfic Writer: Mature? Spike?! Look, can you deny that doing X is perfectly within character for Spike?
InnerFan: (Grudgingly) No.
Fanfic Writer: And would it increase tension and drama in the last third of the story?
InnerFan: (Now pouting) Yes.
Fanfic Writer: And isn't this part of the personality that made you fall for Spike in the first place?
InnerFan: Well, yeah, but Joss kept saying--
Fanfic Writer: Forget Joss! Joss had a screwed up view of what constituted heroes and what Spike needed to do to become one.
InnerFan: But Spike would be backsliding! He should--
Fanfic Writer: If you say 'evolve' I'm gonna smack you. We love, Spike, right? And why do we love him?
InnerFan: (Stubbornly Mute)
Fanfic Writer: Say it.
InnerFan: No.
Fanfic Writer: SAY IT.
InnerFan: We love "Love's Bitch."
Fanfic Writer: So Spike is gonna do X.
InnerFan: (pouting) I guess so.
* You know, I once read an article that said the imaginative process of writing sort of resembles mild schizophrenia. Please note that the schizophrenia is only mild.>:)
no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 08:58 pm (UTC)So when do we get to read said fic?
no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 11:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 09:01 pm (UTC)I have those conversations with myself even if I'm not writing. I have no need for Spike to be heroic. Just so long as he's not eating people and being a complete turd. I have no problem with him doing good stuff because he wants to get into someone's pants. I say fair enough. I say to all the mass murderers/terrorists of this world, who are strapping explosives to their bodies at this moment, intent on blowing up innocent civilians... I say to them, Hey. Here's a cute chick. Do good stuff and it might just impress her! And if he did, well that's a fucking victory!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-04 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 11:29 am (UTC)Embrace the Dark Side, young padawan, it is your destiny.
And you can always slaughter Buffy after Spike's shagged her in the great ME tradition of have sex and die. It'll be canonical ::nods::
no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 06:47 pm (UTC)As for Wes... I still don't know. SOMEONE in Wilah is going to have to bite it. In my story Wilah function as sort of a mirror Spuffy... the same only different. Wes wants Lilah and is shamed by the want. Lilah is willingly particpating in "very bad things." There need to be consequences. The question is... should the consequence be Wes going on after Lilah's death? Lilah seeing the consequences of her actions in Wesley's death? Or both of them going out in some darkly twisted Romeo/Juliet way... and if so, am I overdosing on the dark because the plot has some positively Jossian bleakness to it's planned (near) ending.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-06 06:46 am (UTC)If you kill Lilah, Wes puts it all down as sad but something the whore fundamentally deserves and heads back to panting after madonna Fred. In doing which, doesn't really get either women, but Wes is deeply fucked-up that way and he won't make a major change in his moral stance.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-07 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-05 09:41 pm (UTC). . .wait, that didn't sound right. >:)