Ah... old movies
Apr. 7th, 2005 11:35 pmAh. Terminator is on. The original. You know, it's so clear that the original was a low budget movie. Music is cheesy, and so much of it is clearly low budget production. (Plus it's so clearly 80s!) But, you know, the story still works for me. That and of course the ever romantic, cheesy, and I-unashamedly-love-it scene of "I came across time for you, Sarah."
That scene gets me every time. Sniffle. Poor Reese.
Sometimes a nice cheesy story trumps cheap production values. T1 is one of those instances.
That scene gets me every time. Sniffle. Poor Reese.
Sometimes a nice cheesy story trumps cheap production values. T1 is one of those instances.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:32 pm (UTC)Actually, I think it's STILL one of my very favorite movie romances.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 07:37 am (UTC)But damn, the effects look dated now. That latex head with the missing eye socket was, like, ground-breaking at the time, too. And the cheap electronic music! All that much more amazing to compare the original, as cheap as it was, to the kind of money that was spent on T2...
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:34 pm (UTC)That "You're Terminated fucker" at the end is SO cathartic... and heartbreaking because Kyle... sniffle.
Cheesy effects aside, T1 is perfectly paced and well plotted.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 03:34 pm (UTC)I love T1's story structure. It's tight as a drum. You feel so symapthetic to everyone - the poor anonymous people the Terminator kills right at the beginning, the cops, the dancers at the club... nobody deserves what happens. There's this wonderful sense of unavoidable fate, and how you just have to learn to cope with it, and rise to the occasion... Sarah Connor is still one of the most interesting female characters ever created for the screen, in my book. And damn if Michael Biehn isn't such the dreamy doomed darling... I think my favorite moment is still the one after he confesses to Sarah that he loves her, then pulls back all angry at himself for saying it... and she goes after him. Sigh... hits my every romance jones, right there.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 07:52 am (UTC)That scene in the motel still gets me too. He's so sincere and yet so in awe of her at the same time. And man...sooooooooo very hot. I was gutted they cut his scene from T2.
Pity he got so fat later :(
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:38 pm (UTC)And, yeah, I too was gutted they cut his scene. I had actually read the T2 tie-in novel before the movie came out and so knew that the scene existed (as it had been taken from the script) and was so saddened that it wasn't in the movie. Is it on the DVD because either I had such a vivid imagination from having read the scene or I've seen that scene at some point.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 03:31 pm (UTC)Yes, it's in the extended edition. He comes to her in her cell and sits on her bed and looks every bit as delectable as he did in T1.
::sighs::
I have that with the Ghostbusters tie-in though, which I read about 10 times when I was a teenager. I still wonder what happened to certain scenes when I watch it...and then I remember.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 08:16 am (UTC)This line still makes me teary eyed, after all these years. And I am not a crying person.
I love Terminator. The effects seems dated yeah, but the story...*sigh* so sad and so hopeful at the same time.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:40 pm (UTC)Really, how many action movies make you cry? Terminator hit well on both action AND romance. Not an easy combo. No wonder it was a hit.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 08:51 am (UTC)My. I think I need a nice, cool shower.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 10:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:20 pm (UTC)Plus? Nekkid Ahnold is teh hawt! {g}
no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-08 02:44 pm (UTC)