Oh Noz!111!!

While browsing Audible.com's 100 essential audiobooks, I read one of the 'reviews' for Game of Thrones. Some reader review gave it a bad rating and had this to say:

"It is a shame that George R. R. Martin, who has shown great skill in working out a complex political mystery, had to include so many solicitous sexual scenes"

Solicitous sex? Is this a bad thing? Wouldn't want someone being solicitous during sex, now would we?

Reading the rest of the review where the "reviewer" complained about "uncontrolled lust" and "perversion," while suggesting that the book would be so much better with the sex taken out (especially any hints of homosexuality) I realized that the dumbass idiot 'reviewer' didn't mean solicitous sex but had meant salacious sex (well, not even that, really, but you know what I mean).

::headdesk:

People, it's called a dictionary (and a mind). Use it. Oh, and don't worry about the scourge of solicitous sex! >:)

Oh Noz!111!!

While browsing Audible.com's 100 essential audiobooks, I read one of the 'reviews' for Game of Thrones. Some reader review gave it a bad rating and had this to say:

"It is a shame that George R. R. Martin, who has shown great skill in working out a complex political mystery, had to include so many solicitous sexual scenes"

Solicitous sex? Is this a bad thing? Wouldn't want someone being solicitous during sex, now would we?

Reading the rest of the review where the "reviewer" complained about "uncontrolled lust" and "perversion," while suggesting that the book would be so much better with the sex taken out (especially any hints of homosexuality) I realized that the dumbass idiot 'reviewer' didn't mean solicitous sex but had meant salacious sex (well, not even that, really, but you know what I mean).

::headdesk:

People, it's called a dictionary (and a mind). Use it. Oh, and don't worry about the scourge of solicitous sex! >:)

Oh Noz!111!!

While browsing Audible.com's 100 essential audiobooks, I read one of the 'reviews' for Game of Thrones. Some reader review gave it a bad rating and had this to say:

"It is a shame that George R. R. Martin, who has shown great skill in working out a complex political mystery, had to include so many solicitous sexual scenes"

Solicitous sex? Is this a bad thing? Wouldn't want someone being solicitous during sex, now would we?

Reading the rest of the review where the "reviewer" complained about "uncontrolled lust" and "perversion," while suggesting that the book would be so much better with the sex taken out (especially any hints of homosexuality) I realized that the dumbass idiot 'reviewer' didn't mean solicitous sex but had meant salacious sex (well, not even that, really, but you know what I mean).

::headdesk:

People, it's called a dictionary (and a mind). Use it. Oh, and don't worry about the scourge of solicitous sex! >:)