Good To Know
Jun. 4th, 2007 01:30 pmEvery now and then it's good to be reminded that TWOP can sometimes produce "What the freaking HELL?!" points of view. I was always well aware of this with BtVS and AtS (where TWOP regularly put their insanity up for public view). However, since my main TWOP reading is on the soap threads, which are largely comprised of frothy snark that is designed for amusing ourselves rather than analysis of ludicrous storylines, I tend to fall into the habit of thinking to TWOP as lightly amusing and congenial while forgetting that there are forums on TWOP which are anything but. Basically soapy threads tend to be pure amusement and little else. It's so contrary to the TWOP/Whedonverse experience that sometimes I forget why TWOP can be so incredibly irritating.
The last two Dr. Who eps and my experience of the TWOP forums have provided a nice reminder about what exactly was so incredibly annoying with regards to TWOP/Whedonverse. Reading TWOP/Dr. Who reactions to this weekend's Dr. Who is like reading a reaction to an entirely different episode than the one I watched. Oh, there's some vague similarities in plot, but it's clear from reading views of the characters that there are worlds of differences between the show they viewed and the one I saw (most specifically in my take on Mr. Smith vs. The Doctor and my views of The Matron).
Sometimes it truly is amazing that people can see the same text and come away with entirely different feelings and interpretations of what they saw.
And I'll probably post something on the episodes themselves tonight.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 07:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 10:42 pm (UTC)Don't get me wrong, I like that they made Mr. Smith flawed so I'm not criticizing that they had Mr. Smith have less admirable moments, and I'm not denying his heroism at finally realising he had to be replaced by The Doctor, but the drooling over Mr. Smith and the Smith/Matron romance really confuzzled me. I bought that Smith/Matron fell for one another, but I wasn't blown-over by the two. In fact there are parts of both Smith and the matron which I disliked, especially in regards to how they treated Martha. But then the TWOP thread seems to be heavy on people who hate Martha for either not being Rose, or for being infatuated with The Doctor or both simultaneously. It seems that a lot of what they liked about Smith and his love interest were the things I found least likable about them -- namely that they could totally ignored Martha's intelligence and valor and merely saw her as a black maid.
The episode itself was enjoyed by the thread and I enjoyed the episode. But I didn't react to the characters in the way many, if not most, of the people on the TWOP thread did.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-04 11:13 pm (UTC)The thing I liked about John Smith/Joan was that they were perfectly of their time with all the virtues or flaws the entails. I didn't get the sense that the writers were saying these people were savages or noble heroes. It's a very rare thing in SF TV when it comes to time travel.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 01:30 am (UTC)I agree with what you've said thus far about the characterizations - I've been absolutely adoring Martha, even with the little wistful lovesickness, because no matter how she might feel, it doesn't stop her doing the right thing at the right time, and she's smart as well as brave.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 03:31 am (UTC)Really, can't we enjoy the series and the new characters even though Rose is no longer part of it? The show handled her lovingly and they continue to do so. No reason to disallow characters the chance to change or for new characters to shine.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-05 03:43 am (UTC)I just got a copy of the original novel; I have to see what all was changed in it, notably switching from Doctor Seven...
no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 04:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 05:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-06 02:28 pm (UTC)