I posted this in Sue's journal thinking it was yours, but I'll post it here, too.
I watched the show, but stopped when they moved it from Thursday night. But I think it's back in its old time slot, but even if it isn't...BONCE! BONCE! BONCE!!!!!! I'm watching it, baby! *g*
Hold onto your hats though for the OMG HE'S RUININ' M'SHOW!!!! wails. ;P
I don't know, I was definitely one of the "oh noes *headdesk* *headdesk*" people over Torchwood, but this is rather a different matter. Without a Trace is one of my favorite shows as well, and this is, while being a promising and lucrative step for James Marsters himself, not something that should provide a basic conflict between one long-established fandom versus another long-established fandom.
ROFL! Oh, you are SO right! (Remember the very first ep of the OC, when we were all in chat and RQ and BX had "plotted" their first Seth/Ryan slashfic before the end credits had even run?)
I've gotten so used to that sort of response that while watching a marathon of old "Anne of Green Gables" episodes on Louisiana public tv this past weekend, I actually found myself wondering if there's any Anne/Diana femslash out there. Eeeep! And then had to slap myself silly for having such a revolting idea!
Oh man that really *was* slashy, though. I picked up on that when I was still in grade school. Though maybe that was because they did say "bosom" a lot...
HAHAHAHAHA!!! Bosom friends, yeah. And I love that the first time Anne says it to Marilla... well, the look that Colleen Dewhurst gave Megan Follows was priceless!
(But still... in the context of the time the books were written? Gawd!)
I'm afraid that I still don't get it. Not the wanking over Martha and not the wanking over JM. Jack's a fairly recent development and so is Torchwood. And it's still just a guestspot and one that looks potentially entertaining.
Well, it's basically the collision of one fandom with another that makes people testy in this case. The Doctor Who universe fans get a little fed up with the people who disparage the show and simultaneously wonder who "Spike" gets to snog. The JM fans get upset with the accusations that somehow a single one-off character will ruin the entire show.
I don't get BBC America, so no Torchwood for me. Otoh, I think Dr. Who is cheesy in an off-putting way, so I'm not sure I really care about not getting Torchwood.
Not much of a procedural gal, myself, which is why I'm pleased that if JM is going to be on a procedural, it's one I'll actually watch. Without a Trace is probably the only procedural I've watched with anything approaching consistency since the early days of Law and Order.
WoT does a fairly decent job of combining character arcs with the mystery of the week and so has more of a personal life for characters than Law and Order. (Off hand, I remember the drug addiction arc of one of the main characters as it played for at least a season. I remember the child custodial battles of the lead male character and his first wife, then his relationship with an federal attorney who ended up taken by a serial killer, etc. And another FBI agent whose brother had problems with drug dealers -- and said brother killed himself in the episode) Though it is true that, almost inevitably, it seems that every FBI agent on the show is working out some personal issue through being in the FBI. Anyway, it isn't a strictly clinical show nor is it a soap opera of a show like say "Grey's Anatomy". It tends to relate the cases to the agents involved (and the agents involved in the cases seems to rotate) It also mixes up whether the person who is missing is abducted, whether the person simply ran away from their lives, whether they were murdered, etc. so it's not always the exact same thing every week.
At any rate, it's a bazillion light-years ahead of "The Mountain," which was just a load of unwatchable crap.
I'm quite looking forward to this, though it's not a show I've ever watched. However, importantly, I could because it's shown here on terrestrial, which is great.
I'm looking forward to TW too, though, which is not something I ever thought I'd say because it's so rubbish. But never mind that. We Brits get to see JM snog another bloke on telly first.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 04:12 pm (UTC)I watched the show, but stopped when they moved it from Thursday night. But I think it's back in its old time slot, but even if it isn't...BONCE! BONCE! BONCE!!!!!! I'm watching it, baby! *g*
Hold onto your hats though for the OMG HE'S RUININ' M'SHOW!!!! wails. ;P
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:26 pm (UTC)Seriously, I wonder how long it'll take before we do see Mars/Seely slash. LOL
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 09:17 pm (UTC)I've gotten so used to that sort of response that while watching a marathon of old "Anne of Green Gables" episodes on Louisiana public tv this past weekend, I actually found myself wondering if there's any Anne/Diana femslash out there. Eeeep! And then had to slap myself silly for having such a revolting idea!
*with profound apologies to LMM*
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 09:34 pm (UTC)(But still... in the context of the time the books were written? Gawd!)
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:43 pm (UTC)and one that looks potentially entertaining.no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 04:47 pm (UTC)I didn't watch a lot of last season (time slot issues, I think), but I'll have to start watching again. There's a lot of pretty on that show already.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 07:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 08:07 pm (UTC)WoT does a fairly decent job of combining character arcs with the mystery of the week and so has more of a personal life for characters than Law and Order. (Off hand, I remember the drug addiction arc of one of the main characters as it played for at least a season. I remember the child custodial battles of the lead male character and his first wife, then his relationship with an federal attorney who ended up taken by a serial killer, etc. And another FBI agent whose brother had problems with drug dealers -- and said brother killed himself in the episode) Though it is true that, almost inevitably, it seems that every FBI agent on the show is working out some personal issue through being in the FBI. Anyway, it isn't a strictly clinical show nor is it a soap opera of a show like say "Grey's Anatomy". It tends to relate the cases to the agents involved (and the agents involved in the cases seems to rotate) It also mixes up whether the person who is missing is abducted, whether the person simply ran away from their lives, whether they were murdered, etc. so it's not always the exact same thing every week.
At any rate, it's a bazillion light-years ahead of "The Mountain," which was just a load of unwatchable crap.
no subject
Date: 2007-08-15 10:33 pm (UTC)I'm looking forward to TW too, though, which is not something I ever thought I'd say because it's so rubbish. But never mind that. We Brits get to see JM snog another bloke on telly first.