Head Vs. Heart
Feb. 6th, 2008 12:57 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
shipperxI don't post about politics. No, I really don't. I tend toward the line of thought that you should vote for whoever you want because it's a big personal decision that you've probably reached from your experiences over a lifetime and I sure as hell can't tell you how to think and/or feel. [ETA: And by 'I' I mean 'I'. I'm in no way criticizing anyone for posting whatever they want in their LJs. That's what LJs are for. It's just that I don't want to do it in my own journal.]
Anyway, even though I don't post about politics, I found this MSNBC article interesting:
When It's Head Versus Heart, The Heart Wins
Excerpt:
"...The fact that people have what is euphemistically called cognitive-processing limitations—most cannot or will not learn about and remember candidates' records or positions—means voters must substitute something else for that missing knowledge. What that something is has become a heated topic among scientists who study decision-making, and, of course, campaign strategists and pollsters. Some answers are clear, however. In general elections, a large fraction of voters use political party as that substitute, says psychologist Drew Westen of Emory University; some 60 percent typically choose a candidate solely or largely by party affiliation. The next criterion is candidates' positions on issues; single-issue voters in particular will never even consider a candidate they disagree with. In a primary, however, party affiliation is no help, since all of the choices belong to the same one. And parsing positions doesn't help much this year, especially in the Democratic race, where the policy differences between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are minute. "When voting your party doesn't apply, and when the candidates don't differ much on the issues, you have to choose on some other basis," says political scientist Richard Lau of Rutgers University, coauthor of the 2006 book "How Voters Decide." "That's when you get people voting by heuristics [cognitive shortcuts] and going with their gut, with who they most identify with, or with how the candidates make them feel." What has emerged from the volatile and unpredictable primary season so far is that the candidates who can make voters feel enthusiasm and empathy—and, perhaps paradoxically, anxiety—are going to make it to November and maybe beyond."
Anyway, even though I don't post about politics, I found this MSNBC article interesting:
When It's Head Versus Heart, The Heart Wins
Excerpt:
"...The fact that people have what is euphemistically called cognitive-processing limitations—most cannot or will not learn about and remember candidates' records or positions—means voters must substitute something else for that missing knowledge. What that something is has become a heated topic among scientists who study decision-making, and, of course, campaign strategists and pollsters. Some answers are clear, however. In general elections, a large fraction of voters use political party as that substitute, says psychologist Drew Westen of Emory University; some 60 percent typically choose a candidate solely or largely by party affiliation. The next criterion is candidates' positions on issues; single-issue voters in particular will never even consider a candidate they disagree with. In a primary, however, party affiliation is no help, since all of the choices belong to the same one. And parsing positions doesn't help much this year, especially in the Democratic race, where the policy differences between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are minute. "When voting your party doesn't apply, and when the candidates don't differ much on the issues, you have to choose on some other basis," says political scientist Richard Lau of Rutgers University, coauthor of the 2006 book "How Voters Decide." "That's when you get people voting by heuristics [cognitive shortcuts] and going with their gut, with who they most identify with, or with how the candidates make them feel." What has emerged from the volatile and unpredictable primary season so far is that the candidates who can make voters feel enthusiasm and empathy—and, perhaps paradoxically, anxiety—are going to make it to November and maybe beyond."
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 10:06 pm (UTC)Except - I'm highly aware that I have a lot of young readers in my LJ. (a LOT). And they're not always clued in to all the issues. So many times, I've posted about an ongoing issue, and gotten comments like "I wouldn't have known about this if you hadn't posted".
I'm a politics junkie, it's undeniable. And since my LJ is my space (emphatically NOT "myspace), it's gonna be about things I care about, whether that's dogs, tv shows, ephemera, or politics :D
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 11:57 pm (UTC)