Wait, Wait... What?
Aug. 1st, 2008 12:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(Sorry for spamming. )
I'm killing time at my desk at lunch (hence the sudden patch of posting). Anyway, I hopped over to Audible.com to see if there were any new downloadable books to listen to, and what to my wondering eyes should appear...
Look at the bottom of the page. The link/advert to - Pamela Aidan - Best of Jane Austen Fan-Fiction
Wha-huh?!
I'm in no way surprised that there is such a thing as Jane Austen fanfic. I mean, I pretty much take as a given that there's probably fanfic for everything from Care Bears to the Bible. And I also realize that due to when they were written that Austen novels have no copyright restrictions. Still, this is a commercial site. This stuff is being sold. An outlet for commercial books is calling some of its offerings 'fan-fiction.' In fact, they're selling it as an audio version of fanfiction.
Does anyone think that this may set a sketchy precedent? I know that there have been a ton of published faux-sequels to Austen books, and that these Audible entries are almost certainly published "sequels. " But Audible, a commercial site, referring to published novels as 'fanfiction' makes me uneasy. You just know that there are fanficcers out there who think they can get book deals (Er, I mean other than the ones who already have. And I'm not talking original novelists who also happen to write fanfic. I'm referring to some of the craziness that's happened in the Harry Potter fandom and that crazy self-published Star Wars fangirl on Amazon.com a couple of years ago).
It seems to me that businesses attempting to blur the lines between fanfiction and commercial fiction can lead to fandom troubles. (Of course, everything always seems to, but still...) There truly are people who have weird thoughts that rather than writing Harry/Snape fanfic, they can publish (and profit) from Harry/Snape novels. Commercial companies probably shouldn't encourage such people by calling published books 'fanfiction.'
Fanfiction is for fun not profit.
I'm killing time at my desk at lunch (hence the sudden patch of posting). Anyway, I hopped over to Audible.com to see if there were any new downloadable books to listen to, and what to my wondering eyes should appear...
Look at the bottom of the page. The link/advert to - Pamela Aidan - Best of Jane Austen Fan-Fiction
Wha-huh?!
I'm in no way surprised that there is such a thing as Jane Austen fanfic. I mean, I pretty much take as a given that there's probably fanfic for everything from Care Bears to the Bible. And I also realize that due to when they were written that Austen novels have no copyright restrictions. Still, this is a commercial site. This stuff is being sold. An outlet for commercial books is calling some of its offerings 'fan-fiction.' In fact, they're selling it as an audio version of fanfiction.
Does anyone think that this may set a sketchy precedent? I know that there have been a ton of published faux-sequels to Austen books, and that these Audible entries are almost certainly published "sequels. " But Audible, a commercial site, referring to published novels as 'fanfiction' makes me uneasy. You just know that there are fanficcers out there who think they can get book deals (Er, I mean other than the ones who already have. And I'm not talking original novelists who also happen to write fanfic. I'm referring to some of the craziness that's happened in the Harry Potter fandom and that crazy self-published Star Wars fangirl on Amazon.com a couple of years ago).
It seems to me that businesses attempting to blur the lines between fanfiction and commercial fiction can lead to fandom troubles. (Of course, everything always seems to, but still...) There truly are people who have weird thoughts that rather than writing Harry/Snape fanfic, they can publish (and profit) from Harry/Snape novels. Commercial companies probably shouldn't encourage such people by calling published books 'fanfiction.'
Fanfiction is for fun not profit.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 05:44 pm (UTC)I agree that it's kind of disturbing for Audible to be calling this "fan-fiction." "Inspired by" works just as well.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 01:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-01 11:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 01:07 am (UTC)Gah, where's the brain bleach when you need it!
::Not going to google, not going to google...::
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 01:21 am (UTC)>:)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-02 02:46 am (UTC)::shudders::
:D
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:32 am (UTC)Pamela Aidan actually wrote a three-book series based on Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. You can find her books in regular bookstores. Since all of Austen's work is out of copyright, her characters are fair game for novelists. There are actually quite a number of novels based on Austen's works.
Anyway, Aidan's books were published by Touchstone Books, an imprint of Simon & Schuster. While her story may have started out as fanfic on the web and then progressed to a self-published (i.e. vanity) series, a real publisher did eventually pick it up. Thus, it's a bit different for it to have an audiobook than your average web- or 'zine-published fanfic. You won't find Snape/Harry in your local bookstore, after all.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-13 03:38 am (UTC)But that still doesn't explain why a commercial site like audible.com was advertising them as fanfic.