Oh Joss, what has become of you?
Aug. 27th, 2010 12:43 pm::waves to the journal stalkers (you know who you are because I've been told I've been name checked though I've never even been to your board, Whedonesque, or ever interacted with Scott Allie) lurkers I may offend by having opinions... in my own LJ::
So, the whole comic preview 'thing.' (Oh look! Angel is now David Berkowitz and is that Oceanic Flight 815 losing an engine that nails Donnie Darko? [/snark])
If fandom speculation about this preview proves true, I'm going to laugh my ass off about the poll I ran seven months ago guessing the ways that Joss would negate Bad Angel-Twangel (It's okay, Peaches. You aren't responsible for anything) and freeing the comics of having anypoint meaningful consequences by going ye old route of alternative timelines and do-overs.
I see that there's an old dog, in the preview. Wonder if he has any new tricks...
So, the whole comic preview 'thing.' (Oh look! Angel is now David Berkowitz and is that Oceanic Flight 815 losing an engine that nails Donnie Darko? [/snark])
If fandom speculation about this preview proves true, I'm going to laugh my ass off about the poll I ran seven months ago guessing the ways that Joss would negate Bad Angel-Twangel (It's okay, Peaches. You aren't responsible for anything) and freeing the comics of having any
I see that there's an old dog, in the preview. Wonder if he has any new tricks...
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:03 pm (UTC)I'm just baffled why the hell we needed text effects of the dog licking himself.
As for all the alt timeline stuff, I don't know. I *really* wouldn't make sense if this Angel is from the future. Not that that would make a difference in these things.
Also a little annoyed that at least half of this issue is going to be about trying to make Angel look good.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:07 pm (UTC)Symbolic admission of what these comics actually are?
Also a little annoyed that at least half of this issue is going to be about trying to make Angel look good
As was the Riley one-shot.
However, it's been clear for quite some time that no one involved with this comic remembers the adage that the when one finds themsevles in a hole, the first thing to do is to stop digging.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:50 pm (UTC)Symbolic admission of what these comics actually are?
:)
As was the Riley one-shot.
Yeah, but the Riley one-shot was added so they could give Angel's motivation, no? Sure, they made some possibly interesting contrasts, but in the end it was basically there to say, well, the PTB did it.
Really, though, my annoyance is just my own bias seeping through. At the end of the day, this is supposed to be Buffy's story and I'd rather see a reason why she's a sociopathic superemo than for them to pointlessly try to make Angel OK. (Because in the end, it doesn't matter insofar as the story is concerned.)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-28 09:46 am (UTC)Symbolic admission of what these comics actually are?
No, because in British English 'the dog's bollocks' means that something is superb.
Then again, Joss mangled English slang so badly in the TV show that maybe he does think that 'the dog's bollocks' means the same as 'Bollocks!' without the canine qualifier, in other words exactly the reverse of what it really means. Or else he's insane enough to think that this pile of crap really is the dog's bollocks.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:08 pm (UTC)And if they *seriously* do a time travel thing to *fix* everything I will never ever respect Joss ever again.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:39 pm (UTC)(Actually I think it'll probably be one of the first three. Except not Pete's World - no zeppelins! Also, if it was, then Rose and TenToo would be very busy trying to fix stuff. I can just hear it: "Good grief, this one's worse than Jack! I mean, despite what he says, I'm pretty sure that none of the sex he's ever had has been actually earth-shattering! Rose, hurry up and hand me the reality-stabilisers pronto, or you'll see the Earth blow up for the second time. Weeell, it's a parallel world, but even so. Plus, I'm sure your mother would find a way of surviving and then blame me. How was I supposed to know that this world was full of vampire lunatics?")
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:54 pm (UTC)I briefly toyed with the idea that it's some sort of Bizarro World, headed by Bizarro!Buffy who does the opposite of what Actual!Buffy would do. It would fit right along with all the other DC "homages" going on.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-28 08:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-28 12:18 pm (UTC)Isn't there a storyline in that series where Bizarro destroys his world on purpose because Superman's was destroyed by accident? Bizarro!Angel, too. Explains it all. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:19 pm (UTC)Wonder if the dog is named Vincent (or is it just god spelled backwards?)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 07:35 pm (UTC)Hey, balls! - Angel, where are yours?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 06:42 pm (UTC)The Lost references were (heh!) lost on me. Also, time paradoxes - the refuge of the desperate (unless you're a DW writer, in which case they're mandatory).
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 07:08 pm (UTC)Oh god Joss, where has your writing brain gone? *g*
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 07:19 pm (UTC)anyeffort in the writing of this one).no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 07:37 pm (UTC)Did Angel just got dumber or it's an editorial mistake?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 07:46 pm (UTC)He could be referring to after Not Fade Away with all the talk of ruins. Just my guess since he couldn't have forgotten all that stuff.
The whole from the future thing just really doesn't make sense.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-28 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 08:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-28 11:38 am (UTC)Weirdness.