shipperx: (Being Human Trio)
[personal profile] shipperx

From TV Guide:

Does no one have an original idea in TV land anymore? Judging from tonight's latest batch of mid-season offerings, it hardly appears so. Programmers have either gone to England for inspiration, rarely improving on the source material, or back to the drawing board of tried-and-true formats like the courtroom drama, resulting in an unhappy epidemic of deja view viewing.

The best of tonight's premieres is Syfy's remake of Being Human (9/8c), and even it is a pale imitation of the provocative British original. Given the relatively limited reach of BBC America, and the inexplicable reluctance in some corners to embrace anything with a European accent, I get why Syfy would snap up and adapt this fetching premise for the American audience. In terms of production and casting, though, it leaves quite a bit to be desired.

For the unacquainted, this is the story of three supernatural roommates sharing a house in working-class Boston: an immortal and broodingly Byronic vampire (Sam Witwer, who comes the closest to embodying the spirit of the thing), a mild-mannered werewolf still awkwardly adjusting to his monthly curse (Sam Huntington, whose rhythms are a bit too sitcom-like) and a female ghost (shrill Meaghan Rath) who can't leave the house in which she died under mysterious circumstances. If all of this is new to you, the appealing mix of humor and horror may very well hook you. If you've already fallen in love with the British version, as I have, this uneven carbon copy will seem wildly unnecessary. And like me, you'll just find yourself counting the days until BBC America begins airing new episodes later this year.

Still, Syfy's Being Human is a gem compared to the mess MTV has made of Skins (10/9c), another British transfer that could just as well be titled Barely Human. What in the original incarnation was shockingly cheeky, in its graphic and profane depiction of teens indulging in sex-and-drug debauchery, has been neutered and tamed in a remake that is unconvincing, amateurishly produced and very poorly acted. (The exception being a lesbian cheerleader — a gender-reversed version of a male gay character from the original series — who is the focus of next Monday's episode. She's good, even when the show isn't.).

Date: 2011-01-17 05:11 pm (UTC)
shapinglight: (Being human)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
God, it sounds dire. I'd already made the decision to avoid US Being Human at all costs, and this only strengthens my resolve. As for Skins, though I've never watched it, I have to question why on earth it was thought necessary to change a male gay character for a female one. I suppose it was thought marginally more audience-friendly for the US?

I just hope no one in the the US decided to try and remake Misfits. It would be a total disaster.
Edited Date: 2011-01-17 05:11 pm (UTC)

Date: 2011-01-17 06:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com
I'm pretty sure I'll give it a look out of curiosity, but thus far nothing about it looks as good as the original.

Re: Skins, I don't know enough about it to say.

Date: 2011-01-17 05:45 pm (UTC)
ext_15169: Self-portrait (Default)
From: [identity profile] speakr2customrs.livejournal.com
If I ruled the world it would be illegal for US TV to remake British series.

Date: 2011-01-17 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com
They seem to lose something essential in translation.

Date: 2011-01-17 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com

I think US television has become too overstretched. Nearly every channel has their own "original" series these days and the talent is far too diluted to produce much of anything. Like the NBA, I guess.

Personally, I think the article writer should be too ashamed to have watched anything on MTV anyway. It's like going into an outhouse and complaining of the smell.

Date: 2011-01-17 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com
I think a lot of the channels (especially the networks) have a "just something on" mentality rather than "ooh! That's a neat idea" mentality.

Date: 2011-01-17 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zanthinegirl.livejournal.com
I've never seen either version of Skins, but I'm such a fan of Being Human. I'm strongly suspect that the remake will completely miss the point. I may give an episode or two a chance (I still haven't decided) but I'm not expecting much. After what they did to Life on Mars...

Part of the problem is that the original airs on BBA. It's not available in my area unless you get the most expensive cable package, and so i suspect a lot of people don't get the channel at all! I'm planning on down-grading my cable package so I'll be joining the masses here.

Date: 2011-01-18 12:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com
This surprises me not at all. I'm furious on behalf of both original shows. NOT COOL, AMERICAN TV. NOT COOL.

Date: 2011-01-18 05:51 am (UTC)
silverusagi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] silverusagi
Remake city, that's for sure.

Though I'll probably watch the U.S. Being Human at least once, because it has the guy who played Lucifer on SPN in it. But I'll also probably wait until the series is done; it's not high on my list.

April 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24 252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 01:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios