(no subject)

[shipperx]

:
:
Full Article:
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/123497829.html


Excerpt:

Where history is concerned, this is fast becoming a nation of ignoramuses and amnesiacs.

The alarm bell has been ringing for years. Consider "Losing America's Memory: Historical Illiteracy in the 21st Century," a 2000 study by the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, a Washington-based advocacy group.

Researchers found that the majority of seniors at the nation's best colleges could not identify the words of the Gettysburg Address or explain the significance of Valley Forge. They did not know, the study concluded, because they had not been taught. History, the study said, was no longer a requirement in the nation's top schools.

And then, there is a 2006 assessment by the Education Department's National Center for Education Statistics, often called the Nation's Report Card. It found that nearly 40 percent of high school seniors could not identify the purpose of the Lewis and Clark Expedition {...}  If kids are bored by that, who can blame them? And who cares?

We all should. No child should be able to finish public school, much less college, without a firm grasp of American history. Because history is not dust. Nor is it myths we tell to comfort and acquit ourselves.  Nor is it a lever we twist in order to gain political advantage. No, our history is the master narrative of who we are.

It is a narrative of slaves and soldiers, inventors and investors, demagogues and visionaries, of homicide, fratricide and genocide, of truths held self-evident and of government of the people, by the people and for the people....

(rest of article: http://www.startribune.com/opinion/otherviews/123497829.html ) 

---

Book Rec's in this regard:
Lies My Teacher Told Me 
(Professional review:  Americans have lost touch with their history, and in Lies My Teacher Told Me Professor James Loewen shows why. After surveying eighteen leading high school American history texts, he has concluded that not one does a decent job of making history interesting or memorable. Marred by an embarrassing combination of blind patriotism, mindless optimism, sheer misinformation, and outright lies, these books omit almost all the ambiguity, passion, conflict, and drama from our past.   From the truth about Columbus's historic voyages to our national leaders, Loewen revives our history, restoring the vitality and relevance it truly possesses.

Thought provoking, nonpartisan, and often shocking, Loewen unveils the real America in this iconoclastic classic beloved by high school teachers and history buffs alike. )

---

Back to fannish material:

Meanwhile, in the totally fictional (and bloodsoaked) history of Westeros (Game of Thrones), I have finished about 85% of Storm of Swords now and...

OMG I hate Cersei Lannister!  I want deeply horrible, vile, horrible, dire, awful, painful, excruciating, horrible things to happen to her!

I don't hate her in a 'she's a villain and so I hate in  a love to hate" way where I wonder "Hmm... what scheme will she come up with next?" while mentally rubbing my hands together in anticipation (Littlefinger has me intrigued in this regard) .  No, the hate I bear for this character is  "I know she's only a fictional character but I want something truly permanent, horrible, and painful to happen to her, and I will most  likely cheer any character that can do it ...because did I mention that I HATE her?  Because I do!" 

*ahem*

Back to your usual LJ broadcasting....

Comments

[queenofattolia.livejournal.com]

I hate Cersei too, so it drives me nuts that the TV series is softening the character. I suspect this is because the actress's participation hinged on making the character more "complex" - that is, rewriting her history and motivations so that she doesn't come off as a complete monster. Please.

Cersei is one of the great villains of the books and they've turned her into someone who used to "love" her husband (and had an otherwise non-existent baby with him out of "love") and who is carrying out her father's mandate because 1) her brothers are incapable of it, 2) she is a mother fiercely protecting her child and 3) she was wronged and thwarted by her awful husband and so had to take his power. Please. Martin was pretty plain about Cersei's nature in the books: she's a power-mad, selfish, vicious LOON.

I'm really tired of watching Lena Headey furrowing her brow thoughtfully and making quiet, measured observations. CERSEI IS CRAZY. When the hell are they going to show it?