BtVS Monthly Comic Whatever
Nov. 3rd, 2010 03:58 pmNow, admittedly, I haven't read it, just the summaries of it, but from the sounds of it, they didn't have time to make sense have significant character moments because they had to rush on to... boring us.
Ooh! Look, it's a 'Becoming' redux. Glad they bypassed character moments or coherent plot development for that. Let no dead horse be unbeaten.
*yawn*
Ooh! Look, it's a 'Becoming' redux. Glad they bypassed character moments or coherent plot development for that. Let no dead horse be unbeaten.
*yawn*
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 09:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 09:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 09:15 pm (UTC)Seems this month it's really just that...boring. Half the cast is possessed, so they don't have to come up with character motivation and the others are just bland.
Also it pretty much cements that the Spuffy panels in the last issue where exactly what they looked like. Fan service without any actual meaning for the characters.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 09:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2010-11-04 02:32 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 09:30 pm (UTC)Its so sad that something that was once good has devolved so far up its own arse into something so poor and repetitve.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 01:10 am (UTC)Honestly, it floors me that THIS FAR IN we're still being told that it'll make sense in the 'next' issue (it's always the next issue) and even though we're given no indication any where of anything good in the offing, we're to perpetually believe that somehow Joss is going to make three plus years of pointlessness pay off in the end.
Sure, Joss. Surrrrre.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 10:10 pm (UTC)It's sad to see these characters reduced to nothing more than stereotypes. That's all they are is stereotypes. There is no characterization in it. That in and of itself wrecks the 'verse more than any glowy lion.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 10:46 pm (UTC)Only, painfully obvious or not, there it is.
What? You thought creativity was going to be involved?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 10:58 pm (UTC)Whedon you should be ashamed of yourself.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 11:22 pm (UTC)Did you find a link?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 03:42 am (UTC)Seriously, just tell us to pull out the DVDs of Season 2, already. NONE OF THIS IS NEW! Which only makes it more offensive.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 01:18 am (UTC)Angel is still Twilight, evil again (but it still won't matter because 'it's not really him"), Willow's gone red-eyed invoking magic again, and Buffy ignores everyone in favor of specialest most special Angel because he's her OMG twu wuv. And there's an apocalypse coming. (And Spike gets insulted).
Nothing we haven't seen a half dozen times now. Nothing new here.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 01:14 am (UTC)Am I the only one that feels that way?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 01:19 am (UTC)It hardly makes any narrative sense. Maybe it does if you read it purely metaphorically (but I'm not holding my breath) but as straight-up narrative? It makes no damn sense at all.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-06 12:29 am (UTC)And, well, at least for this issue it looks like it might be true, which begs the question of why it's always written that way with Angel? If they insist on making him do awful things, the least they could do is make the character own it.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 07:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-06 12:24 am (UTC)I just hope we Whedonverse people don't end up like this guy, the actor who did the English translation of what must been an immensely confusing anime.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 01:55 pm (UTC)Are there any petitions or attempts at injunctions to stop this madness? Has someone made Joss aware of how pathetic the story has become (for the last what, year and a half?) or how much of a disappointment it, and by proxy, he is at this point?
Cause I think he should know.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-05 06:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: