De-Evolution of Angel
Dec. 13th, 2010 10:49 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
:
So, I'm trying to understand the various Allie and Jeanty Q&A's:
* In the comics we see Twangel cheering on the anti-Slayer crowd, urging his followers to find stuff to turn people against Slayers, turning up the heat on the persecution of Slayers, and Twangel announcing that he had to do these things in order 'to bring Buffy low' ( to get her super-special super powers), so he beat Satsu and plays 'general on the sidelines' figure at the 'epic' battle that kills hundreds of Slayers.
* Then we get the about-face and are told that Twangel hasn't actually harmed anyone. He's been trying to help (squints really had to see how. Still have nothing. We just need to take on faith that without his invisible interference things would have been worse than they are and worse than the unknown alternative... that we also didn't see.)
Angel didn't know anything. He didn't do anything. And anything he did do or it looks like he did, he's not actually responsible forexcept for the 'helping' stuff that we didn't see. But he's gonna feel really bad about... something (not that he did anything, knew anything, or was actually responsible for anything) so feel really bad for the guy, okay?
Great character arc, huh.
So, I'm trying to understand the various Allie and Jeanty Q&A's:
* In the comics we see Twangel cheering on the anti-Slayer crowd, urging his followers to find stuff to turn people against Slayers, turning up the heat on the persecution of Slayers, and Twangel announcing that he had to do these things in order 'to bring Buffy low' ( to get her super-special super powers), so he beat Satsu and plays 'general on the sidelines' figure at the 'epic' battle that kills hundreds of Slayers.
* Then we get the about-face and are told that Twangel hasn't actually harmed anyone. He's been trying to help (squints really had to see how. Still have nothing. We just need to take on faith that without his invisible interference things would have been worse than they are and worse than the unknown alternative... that we also didn't see.)
* But we still had that Twangel had to don the mask to 'bring her low' [though apparently, according to the Q&A and Twangle's 'explanation,' he actually didn't do anything to accomplish that goal and was secretly 'helping' -- in direct opposition to his stated goal (and even though we never see him helping the slayers) ] in order to bring about Twilight.
* Except now Jeanty tells us that Twangel didn't know that Twilight meant space-frakking or the death of the world or... well, let's see....
Looks like Angel basically didn't know anything-- not what Twilight was, how it was activated, what it involved, what it meant, or what it did (nothing wrong with volunteering for a mission like that!). He did, however, know that it was 'better' than the alternative (whatever that was). So, um... he 'knew' the alternative was 'worse' than the Twilight that he had no understanding of ... because a talking dog told him so. Makes perfect sense, right? Who couldn't be persuaded by that? He's not stupid at all! And besides, he didn't actually do anythingexcept the helping stuff that we didn't see.
* So in pursuing the creation of the Twilight [that he didn't know what it was but had decided to 'bring about' by doing ... something (though we're not entirely sure what... which is okay because he had no idea what it would be either) ]
Well, anyway, after he did or didn't do whatever it was he thought he needed to do (but he didn't know what he actually needed to do) to bring about Twilight (whatever he thought that might be), we -- and he -- see that it's destroying the world. So how does he react? Twangel wants to stay in his special world even though he can see that it's bringing about the end of the world. He even gives the circular logic of the present universe being replaced, but Scoobs, who are in the world that is being replaced, would be okay... somehow. In the dead, replaced world that's coming apart at the seams.
* Except now Jeanty tells us that Twangel didn't know that Twilight meant space-frakking or the death of the world or... well, let's see....
Looks like Angel basically didn't know anything-- not what Twilight was, how it was activated, what it involved, what it meant, or what it did (nothing wrong with volunteering for a mission like that!). He did, however, know that it was 'better' than the alternative (whatever that was). So, um... he 'knew' the alternative was 'worse' than the Twilight that he had no understanding of ... because a talking dog told him so. Makes perfect sense, right? Who couldn't be persuaded by that? He's not stupid at all! And besides, he didn't actually do anything
* So in pursuing the creation of the Twilight [that he didn't know what it was but had decided to 'bring about' by doing ... something (though we're not entirely sure what... which is okay because he had no idea what it would be either) ]
Well, anyway, after he did or didn't do whatever it was he thought he needed to do (but he didn't know what he actually needed to do) to bring about Twilight (whatever he thought that might be), we -- and he -- see that it's destroying the world. So how does he react? Twangel wants to stay in his special world even though he can see that it's bringing about the end of the world. He even gives the circular logic of the present universe being replaced, but Scoobs, who are in the world that is being replaced, would be okay... somehow. In the dead, replaced world that's coming apart at the seams.
Makes perfect sense, right? ( Huh? )
* And it's only because Buffy was going back to the world, leaving him in Twilight alone, that Angel decided to go back to the world that was being destroyed, that he didn't seem particularly bothered by it being destroyed (because he wasn't willing to help it until Buffy made him do it) but apparently -- we're now told -- he had no idea was going to be destroyed (other than his standing there witnessing its destruction and not caring very much). In summary, he didn't actually know what 'bringing about Twilight' actually meant, so he didn't actually intend any of what he did (whatever that was that we're still not clear about). And he did it just 'cause a talking dog told him to.
* Then we get Twangel being taken over by Twilight so we can be extra doubly sure that he's really, most sincerely not in control over what he does at the end...even though he's not responsible for any of the rest of it either.
So, let me sum up Twangel's 'character arc' of Season 8:Angel didn't know anything. He didn't do anything. And anything he did do or it looks like he did, he's not actually responsible for
Great character arc, huh.

no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 04:54 pm (UTC)Oh, hell no. Uh-uh. No way.
Also, NO.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 01:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 04:57 pm (UTC)So all that saying everyone was going to die anyway, they really *weren't* going to die anyway?
In the first arc, soldiers are killed to lure Buffy's group to fight some demons which he apparently hung around to watch, he's not responsible for those either?
Seems like he's saying one thing and the entire story is saying something else. Is this more of his interpretation of the story?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 05:19 pm (UTC)Of course not! It was all going to work out... somehow. Now, granted, he had no idea how, but apparently he didn't know anything else either.
This is why everything makes perfect sense and is in character for Angel...
Err... don't metaphorically look at me like that. I don't understand it either.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 05:07 pm (UTC)Yep, that pretty much covers it. Staggering, isn't it...*g*
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 01:48 am (UTC)People also need to read more books.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 05:09 pm (UTC)Isn't it obvious? Angel was possessed the whole time, got de-possessed to have sex with Buffy and then got re-possessed again - the bangel approach. But yeah, he's gonna feel really bad about it.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 01:51 am (UTC)So you see, Angel is really mostly blameless... except when he's "right."
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 05:19 pm (UTC)Any second now I'll wake up from the nightmare...
By which I mean to say: Excellent post! *applauds*
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 07:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 06:05 pm (UTC)Shakatany
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 06:28 pm (UTC)Angel didn't know anything. He didn't do anything. And anything he did do or it looks like he did, he's not actually responsible for. But he's gonna feel really bad about... something (not that he did anything, knew anything, or was actually responsible for anything) so feel really bad for the guy, okay?
Great character arc, huh.
ROFL. That pretty much sums it up.
Has Jeanty done another Q&A, or is this from old ones?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 08:12 pm (UTC)This is the most pure distillation of everything I've read of Allie's and Jeanty's Q&A's. Except Allie says Angel bears responsibility for something, problem is if you pay attention to everything else he says you have to wonder what they think he's actually responsible for.
Then again I'm still trying to figure out how seed breaking = betrayal.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 06:44 pm (UTC)and plays 'general on the sidelines' figure at the 'epic' battle that kills hundreds of Slayers.
And despite the fact that he was in unquestioned command of troops that killed (former) Slayers, and then sent those same troops to be killed, he tells the truth when he says he didn't kill anyone.
Except now Jeanty tells us that Twangel didn't know that Twilight meant space-frakking or the death of the world or...
Except Allie says he did, and considered it an acceptable loss for the greater good.
And in Season 9, his arc is going to be all about atonement for stuff he didn't do, since the stuff he actually did wasn't done. Because when Angel ruins everything Buffy fought for, we should feel sorry for him.
(Damnit, why did this have to happen today, I'm supposed to be kicking off a drabblathon...)
no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 06:49 pm (UTC)we should feel sorry for him.
Well, Kenny was apparently the victim in the Dawn arc... Can't say they aren't consistent in their offensiveness.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 07:27 pm (UTC)I give you a warning: It is South Park, crdue, and it seems more disturbing when it's not in English...
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 07:29 pm (UTC)Doesn't that have a very old, very familiar, ring to it?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:01 am (UTC)But, apparently, this is the more mature retelling
of the same old schtickno subject
Date: 2010-12-13 07:43 pm (UTC)Season 8 is making my brain hurt. I need to stop trying to apply logic.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:02 am (UTC)this weekno subject
Date: 2010-12-13 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:05 am (UTC)Damn him for not doing something somehow that stopped this. Besides, Seeing Red! Nothing tops that. Not murder, massive slayer casualties, or apocalypses (apocalypsii?)
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-13 09:47 pm (UTC)::pets poor Faith::
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 12:12 am (UTC)I occasionally maintain that, like Phoenix, when Wesley recovered Angel from the bottom of the ocean, he'd already been "replaced" by some strange alien Twilight/Phoenix force and it just needed a catalyst to bring it to the surface. The REAL Angel is still on the ocean floor in a box.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 12:18 am (UTC)This in a nutshell is why I won't be sticking around for any story on Angel past issue 40. It's also one of the many problems I have with the comics.
So, okay, Dawn, Buffy, and Willow are supposed to feel responsible and take responsibility for everything they've done? Dawn gets punished for cheating on her boyfriend and apologizes to him and that's how she breaks the spell. Buffy is responsible and the betrayer for a)creating the new universe, b)empowering the slayers, and c)leading an army of slayers. Willow is responsible for hooking up with Saga Vasku, trying to protect the seed, and well being super-willow and killing evil Warren.
But Angel is blameless for everything except being easily duped?
And that's not a sexist, misogynistic message? Alrighty then.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 12:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 01:34 am (UTC)I have a headache now. Can I have some aspirin?
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 02:31 am (UTC)Especially if they all contradict each other.
::rolls eyes very hard::
no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 03:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 04:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-12-14 07:10 pm (UTC)